首页> 外文期刊>Journal of multicultural discourses >Understanding 'Death of Multiculturalism' discourse means understanding multiculturalism
【24h】

Understanding 'Death of Multiculturalism' discourse means understanding multiculturalism

机译:理解“多元文化主义之死”话语意味着理解多元文化主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Marinus Ossewaarde looks at some 'death of multiculturalism' discourses in Western Europe (specifically in the Netherlands, Germany and Britain) in some newspapers in a recent eight month period (Ossewaarde 2014). His project is structured around certain distinctions. For example, he is mindful of national distinctiveness and makes a distinction between at least two types of newspapers (liberal-conservative newspapers and tabloids). Yet, this is combined with a puzzling lack of distinction in relation to politicians. His concern with emphasising the commonalities amongst people he disapproves of is such that it leaves him analysing Geert Wilders, the founding leader of the populist, Party for Freedom, and David Cameron, the UK Prime Minister and leader of the Conservative Party as variants on a common theme. Of course he is aware that Wilders has compared the Quran to Hitler's Mein Kampf and called for a cessation of Muslim migration to the Netherlands and that Cameron would never do anything similar. But he sees opinion-formers like the latter as simply being moderate versions of what Wilders stand for, perhaps as being dupes or 'useful idiots' to the extremists. The positing of such a relationship is not of course new. One thinks of how, for example, cold war warriors used to characterise social democrats in relation to communists. Or, indeed, coming close to Ossewarde's subject, how Islamophobes characterise Muslims as basically a mild or extreme versions of the same pathology.
机译:马里努斯·奥塞瓦德(Marinus Ossewaarde)在最近八个月的时间里,在一些报纸上观察了西欧(特别是在荷兰,德国和英国)的“多元文化主义之死”话语(Ossewaarde 2014)。他的项目围绕某些区别进行组织。例如,他铭记民族特色,并区分了至少两种类型的报纸(保守派报纸和小报)。然而,这与政治家之间的令人困惑的缺乏区分相结合。他对强调他不赞成的人之间的共通性的关注使他得以分析民粹主义者,自由党的创始领导人盖尔·怀尔德斯和英国首相兼保守党领导人戴维·卡梅伦,共同的主题。当然,他知道怀尔德(Wilders)将古兰经与希特勒的《我的奋斗》(Mein Kampf)作了比较,并呼吁停止穆斯林移民到荷兰,而卡梅伦绝不会做任何类似的事情。但是他认为像后者这样的意见形成者仅仅是怀尔德所代表的温和派,也许是极端主义者的欺骗或“有用的白痴”。这种关系的提出当然不是新的。例如,人们想到了冷战勇士如何用来表征社会民主主义者与共产主义者的关系。或者,实际上,很接近奥塞瓦德的主题,伊斯兰教徒如何将穆斯林描述为基本上是同一病理的温和或极端版本。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of multicultural discourses》 |2014年第3期|201-211|共11页
  • 作者

    Tariq Modood;

  • 作者单位

    Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and Citizenship, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:45:08

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号