首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management >Examination of Structured Interview Ratings Across Time: The Effects of Applicant Race, Rater Race, and Panel Composition
【24h】

Examination of Structured Interview Ratings Across Time: The Effects of Applicant Race, Rater Race, and Panel Composition

机译:跨时间的结构化面试评分考试:申请人种族,评分者种族和小组成员组成的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examined the relationship between race and interview ratings in a structured selection panel interview. Data from 1,334 police officer applicants who were interviewed by three-person panels were examined to explore how applicant race, rater race, and panel racial composition related to interview ratings and change from initial to final ratings. Results revealed the largest effect was for panel racial composition, such that predominately White panels provided significantly more favorable ratings to applicants of all races compared to panels composed of predominately Black raters. However, a significant three-way interaction between rater race, applicant race, and panel composition was also found. Specifically, Black raters evaluated Black applicants more favorably than White applicants only when they were on a predominately Black panel. These results may help explain past inconsistencies in the literature regarding the effects of rater race and applicant race on ratings.
机译:这项研究在结构化的选择小组访谈中考察了种族与访谈等级之间的关系。审查了由三人小组进行面试的1,334名警察申请人的数据,以探索申请人种族,评分者种族和小组种族组成如何与面试等级以及从最初等级到最终等级的变化相关。结果显示,对小组种族组成的影响最大,因此,与主要由黑人评估者组成的小组相比,主要是白人小组为所有种族的申请人提供了更为有利的评分。但是,在评估者种族,申请人种族和小组成员组成之间也发现了重要的三向互动。具体而言,只有在黑人占主导地位的小组中,黑人评估者才对黑人申请人的评估比白人申请人更为有利。这些结果可能有助于解释文献中过去关于评分者种族和申请人种族对评分的影响的不一致之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号