【24h】

Delegation or Unilateral Action?

机译:授权还是单方面行动?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Unilateral presidential actions often face implementation problems in the executive branch. I argue these actions are better studied as delegation. I model the conditions under which a president is likely to delegate and provide discretion to subordinates either insulated or uninsulated from their control. I find legislators benefit from agency discretion when presidents pursue policymaking in the executive branch. The threat of legislative sanction induces agents to deviate from presidential priorities, and inter-branch disagreement increases bureaucratic non-compliance in insulated agencies. Nonetheless, in equilibrium, the president is more likely to delegate to insulated agents. Ultimately, the model demonstrates how the politics of direct action are influenced by the need for bureaucratic cooperation. Case studies on US presidential directives mandating public funding of gun violence research and security reforms at government facilities illustrate key features of the model.
机译:单方面的总统行动通常在行政部门面临实施问题。我认为最好将这些行为作为授权进行研究。我对总统可能委派的条件进行建模,并向与他们的控制隔离或未隔离的下属提供酌处权。我发现,当总统在行政部门制定政策时,立法者将从机构的自由裁量权中受益。立法制裁的威胁促使特工背离总统的优先事项,而部门间的分歧则加剧了孤立机构中官僚主义的不遵守情事。但是,在平衡状态下,总统更有可能委派给孤立的特工。最终,该模型说明了官僚合作的需要如何影响直接行动的政治。有关美国总统命令对枪支暴力研究进行公共资助并在政府机构进行安全改革的案例研究说明了该模型的主要特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号