首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Islamic Studies >Educational Divide across Religious Groups in Nineteenth-Century Lebanon: Institutional Effects on the Demand for Curricular Modernization
【24h】

Educational Divide across Religious Groups in Nineteenth-Century Lebanon: Institutional Effects on the Demand for Curricular Modernization

机译:19世纪黎巴嫩各宗教群体的教育鸿沟:对课程现代化需求的制度影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In nineteenth-century Lebanon, while the Christians attended the newly established ‘modern’ schools the Muslims continued to enrol in ‘traditional’ religious schools. This discrepancy is usually attributed to difference in the supply of schools: missionaries and local Christians establishing new schools on the one hand, and the Muslim ulema's resistance to change on the other. This paper adopts an institutional historical approach and studies this educational divide by shifting focus to demand, to parents’ and pupils’ incentives. Approaching education as an economic investment, it studies the interplay between educational needs and the job market that each community faced. Four factors are pointed out as accounting for the difference in the choices made: military service, appeal of the civil service, existence of parallel institutions—courts and schools, and restrictions on Muslims’ commercial interaction with the West. Such factors maintained the demand for traditional schools by providing job opportunities for their graduates. Those jobs were both economically and socially rewarding so that an immediate shift to ‘modern’ education was unnecessary.
机译:在19世纪的黎巴嫩,基督教徒上了刚建立的“现代”学校,而穆斯林则继续在“传统”宗教学校上学。这种差异通常归因于学校供应的差异:传教士和当地基督徒一方面建立了新学校,另一方面穆斯林回教徒抵制变革。本文采用一种制度的历史方法,并通过将重点转移到需求,父母和学生的动机上来研究这种教育鸿沟。将教育视为一项经济投资,它研究了教育需求与每个社区所面临的就业市场之间的相互作用。指出了四个因素来解释做出的选择上的差异:兵役,公务员的吸引力,平行机构(法院和学校)的存在以及对穆斯林与西方的商业往来的限制。这些因素通过为传统学校提供毕业生就业机会来维持对传统学校的需求。这些工作在经济和社会上都是有回报的,因此没有必要立即转向“现代”教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号