首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international relations and development >Between transcendence and necessity: Eric Voegelin, Martin Wight and the crisis of modern international relations
【24h】

Between transcendence and necessity: Eric Voegelin, Martin Wight and the crisis of modern international relations

机译:在超越与必要之间:埃里克·沃格林,马丁·怀特与现代国际关系危机

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This special issue has, as its central concern, the relevance of at least some aspects of theological discussion for international relations. That is, to say the least, an unusual concern in the modern field though it would once have been much more common. In this paper, I want to focus on the parallel arguments of two thinkers who shared a good deal in their analysis of the problems of modern international relations and who root those arguments in a reading that draws heavily on theological concerns, though they come at these concerns from slightly different perspectives: Eric Voegelin and Martin Wight. I will compare and contrast the readings of the modern crisis that Voegelin and Wight offer and their relevance to the contemporary literature of international relations, and I will suggest that there is an ambiguous aspect to their general position which raises important questions about their diagnosis of the 'crisis of the modern'. Indeed, their perspectives are still worth revisiting today for dwelling on the kind of difficult questions that contemporary international relations scholars have a hard time even posing.
机译:这个特殊问题作为其主要关注点,至少是神学讨论的某些方面与国际关系有关。至少可以说,这是现代领域中不寻常的问题,尽管它曾经曾经更加普遍。在本文中,我想集中讨论两个思想家的平行论证,他们在分析现代国际关系问题上有很多共同之处,并且将这些论证植根于严重提倡神学关注的阅读中,尽管他们来自于这些论点。从稍微不同的角度来看问题:埃里克·沃格林(Eric Voegelin)和马丁·怀特(Martin Wight)。我将比较和对比沃格林和怀特所提供的现代危机的读物以及它们与当代国际关系文学的相关性,并且我建议他们的一般立场有一个模棱两可的方面,这对他们对疾病的诊断提出了重要的问题。 “现代危机”。的确,今天的观点仍然值得我们重新审视,以探讨当代国际关系学者甚至很难提出的那种难题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号