首页> 外文OA文献 >The history/theory dialectic in the thought of Herbert Butterfield, Martin Wight and E. H. Carr: audreconceptualisation of the English School of international relations
【2h】

The history/theory dialectic in the thought of Herbert Butterfield, Martin Wight and E. H. Carr: audreconceptualisation of the English School of international relations

机译:Herbert Butterfield,martin Wight和E. H. Carr的思想中的历史/理论辩证法:a ud英国国际关系学院的重新概念化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of my thesis is to reconceptualise the English School of International Relations according to what I describe as the history/theory dialectic. The origins of this dialectic are sought in the thought of E. H. Carr, Herbert Butterfield, and Martin Wight, who drew attention to the interpenetration of history and theory. In their capacity as historians, the writers examined in my thesis struggled with problems normally associated with theoretical work in International Relations and elsewhere and tried to combine personal and impersonal accounts of history. They also emphasised the role of the historian which is no different from that of the theorist in attributing meaning to a series of apparently unrelated events. As international theorists, Butterfield, Wight and Carr underlined the historicity of international theory, and offered a historicist conceptualisation of international change that assigned priority to European interests and values. Their belief in the co-constitution of history and theory, has important consequences for contemporary English School debates concerning the proper definition of the relationship between order and justice, international society and world society, pluralism and solidarism. What lies at the end of the history/theory dialectic is not an unproblematic combination of opposites but the recognition of the need to be cautious towards the categories we use in order to capture and analyse a multidimensional reality which is subject to change.
机译:本文的目的是根据我所说的历史/理论辩证法重新构想英国国际关系学院。这种辩证法的起源是在E.H. Carr,Herbert Butterfield和Martin Wight的思想中寻求的,他们提请注意历史和理论的相互渗透。作为历史学家,作家们在我的论文中研究了通常与国际关系和其他领域的理论工作有关的问题,并试图将个人和非个人的历史叙述相结合。他们还强调了历史学家的作用,这与理论家的作用无异,是将意义归因于一系列看似无关的事件。作为国际理论家,巴特菲尔德,怀特和卡尔强调了国际理论的历史性,并提出了对国际变革的历史主义概念化,将欧洲利益和价值放在首位。他们对历史和理论的合宪性的信仰,对当代英语学校关于秩序与正义,国际社会与世界社会之间的关系,多元化与团结主义的正确定义的辩论具有重要意义。历史/理论辩证法的结尾并不是对立的毫无问题的结合,而是认识到需要谨慎对待我们使用的类别,以捕获和分析可能变化的多维现实。

著录项

  • 作者

    Papagaryfallou Ioannis;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号