首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >Political institutions, lobbying and corruption
【24h】

Political institutions, lobbying and corruption

机译:政治机构,游说和腐败

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although firms use various strategies to try to influence government policy, with lobbying and corruption chiefly among them, and political institutions play an important role in determining policy choices, very little research has been devoted to these topics. This paper tries to fill this gap. Using cross-country enterprise-level data, it investigates (1) the effect of a key political institution, namely electoral rules, on the probability that a firm engages in lobbying activities and (2) the impact of lobbying on influence, accounting for corruption and political institutions. The main conclusion is that lobbying is a significantly more effective way of generating political influence than corruption, and that electoral rules are a key mediating political institution. Our baseline estimate is that the probability of influencing government policy is 16% higher for firms that are members of lobbying groups than for those firms that are not.
机译:尽管公司使用各种策略来尝试影响政府政策,其中主要是游说和腐败,而政治机构在决定政策选择方面起着重要作用,但针对这些主题的研究很少。本文试图填补这一空白。它使用跨国企业级数据调查(1)关键政治制度(即选举规则)对公司从事游说活动的可能性的影响,以及(2)游说对影响力的影响,以解决腐败问题和政治机构。主要结论是,游说是产生政治影响力的一种比腐败有效得多的方法,选举规则是关键的调解政治制度。我们的基准估计是,游说团体成员的公司影响政府政策的可能性比那些没有游说团体的公司高出16%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of institutional economics》 |2017年第4期|917-939|共23页
  • 作者单位

    Brunel Univ London, London, England|Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland|IZA Bonn, Bonn, Germany;

    Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:05:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号