【24h】

Legal Implications on eContent

机译:对eContent的法律影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

New technologies in telecommunication services require new business models. Inadequate payments for UMTS-licences and the end of the Internet-hype forced industries to describe themselves as 'alchemists' and search for the 'killer applications'. Therefore different ideas of using content within such new technologies arose. Since the use of content for these new applications might have legal implications not specifically covered by existing laws this search raises hotly-discussed questions. When considering the business model it is important to understand if licences, notifications or the like are required, or if other restrictions exist. The paper discusses the difference between broadcaster, cabfe provider and simple information-service providers. In particular, the status of Internet-based TV and radio services is discussed and how law differs between terrestrial and cable services (for example, between DVB-T and DVB-C). As copyright law is very strict, the implications of such laws are discussed. However, this article focuses on transmission and on-demand services. In addition, this paper alludes to legal obligations to be considered when providing content services.
机译:电信服务中的新技术需要新的业务模型。 UMTS许可的付款不足以及互联网炒作的结束迫使行业将自己描述为“炼金术士”,并寻求“杀手级应用”。因此,出现了在这种新技术中使用内容的不同想法。由于将这些内容用于这些新应用程序可能会产生法律上的影响,而现有法律并未对此进行明确规定,因此此搜索引发了热烈讨论的问题。在考虑业务模型时,重要的是要了解是否需要许可证,通知等,或者是否存在其他限制。本文讨论了广播公司,cafe服务提供商和简单信息服务提供商之间的区别。特别是,讨论了基于Internet的电视和广播服务的状态,以及地面和有线服务之间法律的差异(例如DVB-T和DVB-C之间)。由于版权法非常严格,因此讨论了此类法律的含义。但是,本文重点介绍传输和按需服务。此外,本文还暗示了提供内容服务时应考虑的法律义务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号