首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Health Services Research & Policy >How comprehensive are the basic packages of health services? An international comparison of six health insurance systems
【24h】

How comprehensive are the basic packages of health services? An international comparison of six health insurance systems

机译:基本保健服务的综合程度如何?六种健康保险体系的国际比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Interest in the composition of the health care menu has grown. Its outwardly comprehensive nature is as rhetorical as the slogans of universal access and affordability. This paper summarizes the international part of a report to the Swiss government, in which we explored the basic package of services covered by social health insurance in France, Germany, Israel, Luxembourg, The Netherlands and Switzerland. The aim of the initial report was to check the appropriateness of the Swiss catalogue, with special attention to the risk of unequal access to health care by rationing of effective services. In this paper, we highlight the major differences in service coverage between the countries and address the possible factors explaining those differences. nnMethods: The contents of the basic packages of the six countries were compared using data from government ministries and sickness funds. nnResults: Coverage is most comprehensive in Germany and Switzerland; these are also the countries with the greatest total health expenditure. Three countries separated nursing care from other types of health care by creating an independent insurance scheme. Some health care benefits are also covered under the heading of social care. High out-of-pocket payments are increasingly used as hidden rationing instruments. nnConclusions: The present comparison highlights the multi-factorial character of the choices made in six countries in order to keep their health care menu within the possibilities offered by available resources.
机译:目标:人们对医疗保健菜单构成的兴趣增加了。其外在的全面性与普遍获得和负担能力的口号一样具有说服力。本文总结了提交给瑞士政府的报告的国际部分,其中我们探讨了法国,德国,以色列,卢森堡,荷兰和瑞士的社会健康保险涵盖的基本服务。初次报告的目的是检查瑞士目录的适用性,并特别注意通过分配有效服务来获得医疗服务的机会不平等的风险。在本文中,我们重点介绍了国家之间服务覆盖率的主要差异,并阐述了解释这些差异的可能因素。 nn方法:使用来自政府部门和疾病基金的数据,比较了这六个国家基本一揽子计划的内容。 nn结果:在德国和瑞士,覆盖范围最广;这些国家还是卫生总支出最大的国家。三个国家通过建立独立的保险计划,将护理与其他类型的医疗分开。一些医疗保健福利也包括在社会护理的标题下。高额的自付费用被越来越多地用作隐藏的配给工具。 nn结论:本比较突出显示了六个国家所做选择的多重因素,以使他们的医疗保健菜单保持在可用资源提供的可能性之内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号