首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Food Science >Consumer Acceptance, Emotional Response, and Purchase Intent of Rib-Eye Steaks from Grass-Fed Steers, and Effects of Health Benefit Information on Consumer Perception
【24h】

Consumer Acceptance, Emotional Response, and Purchase Intent of Rib-Eye Steaks from Grass-Fed Steers, and Effects of Health Benefit Information on Consumer Perception

机译:草饲牛肋骨牛排对消费者的接受程度,情绪反应和购买意愿,以及健康益处信息对消费者认知的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sensory acceptability, purchase intent (PI), consumer emotional profile, and fatty acid profile of rib-eye steaks from four different biological types of grass-fed cattle (Angus, Brangus, Pineywoods, and Holstein) were evaluated. The effects of health benefit information (HBI) pertaining to grass-fed beef on the overall liking (OL), emotional profile, and PI were also studied. Consumers rated steaks from the two nontraditional beef biological types (Pineywoods and Holstein) equally or higher than conventional biological types (Angus and Brangus) in several hedonic (9-point scale) categories. Mean OL scores were 6.1 for Pineywoods and 6.3 for Holstein steaks, versus 5.5 for Angus and 6.0 for Brangus. Hedonic attributes, especially OL and liking of beef flavor, accounted for most of the differences between treatments based on Wilks' Lambda Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) and descriptive discriminant analysis. After knowledge of HBI, OL of all treatments increased, particularly Angus with OL mean score significantly increasing from 5.5 to 6.2. Positive PI increased significantly for Angus (from 48% to 65.33%), Brangus (from 50.67% to 66.67%), and Holstein (from 61.33% to 76%) steaks. Angus steaks, which initially received the lowest beef flavor liking (5.1) showed the most improvement for OL after HBI. Likewise, emotional profiles were improved after HBI, particularly the Interested emotion with a 0.5 unit increased.Practical ApplicationProviding consumers with health benefit information (HBI) can enhance acceptability of grass-fed beef. Fatty acid analyses of steaks from four biological types of steers showed favorable n-6-3 ratios. Although some sensory attributes of cooked rib-eye steaks were scored differently among biological types, knowledge of grass-feeding and healthier fatty acids increased overall liking and purchase intent (PI) across products. Emotional profiles improved after HBI was given to consumers, with some emotions being significantly related to PI odds ratios. This research demonstrated the usefulness of HBI in improving hedonic perceptions of grass-fed steaks and the importance of consumer emotions in predicting PI.
机译:评价了来自四种不同生物类型的草饲牛(安格斯,布朗格斯,松木和荷斯坦)的肋眼牛排的感官接受度,购买意愿(PI),消费者情绪状况和脂肪酸状况。还研究了草饲牛肉的健康益处信息(HBI)对总体喜好(OL),情绪特征和PI的影响。在两种享乐(9分制)类别中,消费者对来自两种非传统牛肉生物类型(Pineywoods和Holstein)的牛排的评价与传统生物类型(Angus和Brangus)相同或更高。 Pineywoods的平均OL分数为6.1,Holstein牛排的平均OL分数为6.3,Angus的平均OL得分为5.5,Brangus的平均OL得分为6.0。享乐主义的属性,尤其是OL和牛肉风味,构成了基于Wilks的Lambda方差多变量分析(MANOVA)和描述性判别分析的处理之间的大部分差异。了解HBI后,所有治疗的OL均升高,尤其是Ang平均评分从5.5显着提高至6.2的安格斯。牛排的安格斯(从48%增至65.33%),班格斯(从50.67%增至66.67%)和荷斯坦(从61.33%增至76%)的阳性PI显着增加。最初获得最低牛肉风味(5.1)的安格斯牛排在HBI之后表现出最大的OL改善。同样,HBI后的情绪状况得到改善,尤其是兴趣情绪每增加0.5个单位。实际应用为消费者提供健康益处信息(HBI)可以提高草饲牛肉的可接受性。对来自四种生物学类型的公牛的牛排进行脂肪酸分析,显示出有利的n-6 / n-3比。虽然在生物类型之间对煮熟的肋眼牛排的某些感官属性评分不同,但是对草食和更健康的脂肪酸的了解增加了产品的总体喜好和购买意向(PI)。将HBI给予消费者后,情绪特征得到改善,某些情绪与PI比值比显着相关。这项研究证明了HBI在改善对草食牛排的享乐主义认识方面的有用性,以及消费者情绪对预测PI的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号