首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Comparison of Sublethal Injury Induced in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium by Heat and by Different Nonthermal Treatments
【24h】

Comparison of Sublethal Injury Induced in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium by Heat and by Different Nonthermal Treatments

机译:热和不同非热处理方式对肠炎沙门氏菌鼠伤寒沙门氏菌致亚致死的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have studied sublethal injury in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium caused by mild heat and by different emerging nonthermal food preservation treatments, i.e., high-pressure homogenization, high hydrostatic pressure, pulsed white light, and pulsed electric field. Sublethal injury was determined by plating on different selective media, i.e., tryptic soy agar (TSA) plus 3% NaCl, TSA adjusted to pH 5.5, and violet red bile glucose agar. For each inactivation technique, at least five treatments using different doses were applied in order to cover an inactivation range of 0 to 5 log units. For all of the treatments performed with a technique, the logarithm of the viability reductions measured on each of the selective plating media was plotted against the logarithm of the viability reduction on TSA as a nonselective medium, and these points were fitted by a straight line. Sublethal injury between different techniques was then compared by the slope and the y intercept of these regression lines. The highest levels of sublethal injury were observed for the heat and high hydrostatic pressure treatments. Sublethal injury after those treatments was observed on all selective plating media. For the heat treatment, but not for the high-pressure treatment, sublethal injury occurred at low doses, which were not yet lethal. The other nonthermal techniques resulted in sublethal injury on only some of the selective plating media, and the levels of injury were much lower. The different manifestations of sublethal injury were attributed to different inactivation mechanisms by each of the techniques, and a mechanistic model is proposed to explain these differences.
机译:我们已经研究了由温和的热量和不同的新兴非热食品保鲜处理(即高压均质化,高静水压,脉冲白光和脉冲电场)引起的肠炎沙门氏菌伤寒鼠伤亡。通过在不同的选择性培养基,即胰蛋白酶大豆琼脂(TSA)加3%NaCl,调节至pH 5.5的TSA和紫红色胆汁葡萄糖琼脂上铺板来确定亚致死损伤。对于每种灭活技术,至少要进行五次使用不同剂量的处理,以覆盖0到5 log个单位的灭活范围。对于使用该技术进行的所有处理,将在每种选择性平板培养基上测得的活力降低的对数与作为非选择性培养基的TSA上活力降低的对数作图,并将这些点用直线拟合。然后通过这些回归线的斜率和y截距比较不同技术之间的亚致死伤害。对于高温和高静水压力治疗,亚致死伤害水平最高。在所有选择性电镀介质上观察到那些处理后的亚致死伤害。对于热处理,但不是高压处理,低剂量时会发生亚致死性伤害,但尚未致死。其他非热技术仅对某些选择性电镀介质造成了亚致死性伤害,伤害水平要低得多。每种技术将不同程度的亚致死损伤归因于不同的灭活机理,并提出了一种机械模型来解释这些差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号