首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Occurrence and Levels of Salmonella, Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, and Listeria in Raw Wheat
【24h】

Occurrence and Levels of Salmonella, Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, and Listeria in Raw Wheat

机译:沙门氏菌,口腔饲料大肠杆菌的发生和水平,生小麦中的李斯特菌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Wheat flour has been implicated in several outbreaks of foodborne illness in recent years, yet little information is available regarding microbial pathogens in wheat and wheat flour. Information about microbial pathogens in wheat is needed to develop effective methods to prevent foodborne illnesses caused by wheat products. From 2012 to 2014, we conducted a baseline study to determine the prevalence and levels of pathogens in wheat samples taken before milling. A total of 5,176 wheat samples were tested for enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), Salmonella spp., Listeria spp., and L. monocytogenes. Positive samples were assayed for most probable numbers (MPNs), and isolates were fingerprinted by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The rate of detection of each pathogen tested was as follows: Salmonella was in 1.23% of the samples (average level of 0.110 MPN/g), EHECs occurred in 0.44% of the samples (0.039 MPN/g), and Listeria spp. occurred in 0.08% of samples (0.020 MPN/g), but L. monocytogenes was not detected. The PFGE assessment found a high diversity for all organisms. All EHEC PFGE patterns (22 of 22) were unique, and 39 of 47 Salmonella patterns (83%) were unique. These results indicate a diverse background of naturally occurring organisms. These findings suggest that the microbial contamination is coming from diverse sources and provide no evidence in support of a specific pathogen load. Altogether, our surveillance study shows that contamination of wheat with pathogens is clearly evident and poses a foodborne illness risk.HIGHLIGHTSPrevalence of Salmonella and E. coli in raw wheat emphasizes the need to cook wheat products.3,891 grain samples were tested for E. coli and Salmonella; 1,285 were tested for Listeria.Of wheat berries sampled, 0.44% were positive for E. coli and 1.23% were positive for Salmonella.Salmonella diversity was high, indicating various animal sources that are difficult to prevent.Cooking wheat products is the best preventative measure against foodborne illness from wheat.
机译:近年来,小麦粉在近几年内爆发了食物中疾病的几种爆发,但在小麦和小麦粉中的微生物病原体提供了很少的信息。需要有关小麦微生物病原体的信息来开发有效的方法,以防止小麦产品引起的食源性疾病。从2012年到2014年,我们进行了基线研究,以确定铣削前采样的小麦样品中病原体的患病率和水平。对Enterohemorlagic大肠杆菌(EHEC),沙门氏菌SPP,SAPRERIA SPP,和L.单核细胞生成的共有5,176个小麦样品。为大多数可能的数量(MPNS)测定阳性样品,并且分离株由脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)指纹。测试的每个病原体的检测率如下:沙门氏菌的样品中的1.23%(平均水平为0.110mPn / g),EHEC在0.44%的样品(0.039mPn / g)中发生,李斯特菌素SPP。发生在0.08%的样品(0.020mPn / g)中,但没有检测到单核细胞元。 PFGE评估发现所有生物都有很高的多样性。所有EHEC PFGE图案(22个共22个)是独特的,47种Salmonella图案中的39种(83%)是独特的。这些结果表明了天然存在的生物的多样化背景。这些发现表明微生物污染来自不同的来源,并没有提供支持特定病原体载荷的证据。我们的监测研究表明,小麦与病原体的污染显然明显,并且造成了食物中的疾病风险。原始小麦的沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌的高潮强调了烹饪小麦产品的需要.3,891对大肠杆菌进行测试。沙门氏菌;测试1,285针对李斯特菌试验。采样的小麦浆果,0.44%为大肠杆菌阳性,1.23%对沙门氏菜阳性为阳性,表明难以预防的各种动物来源。烹饪是最佳预防措施针对小麦的食源性疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号