首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Competition Law & Practice >A 'Tunney Act for Europe'? Settlement and the Re-Judicialisation of European Commission Competition Enforcement
【24h】

A 'Tunney Act for Europe'? Settlement and the Re-Judicialisation of European Commission Competition Enforcement

机译:'欧洲突出的行为'?欧洲委员会竞争执法的解决与重新判定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1. The use of settlement mechanisms, administered under both Arts.7 and 9 of Regulation 1/2003, has become one of the most common features of European Commission enforcement activity in recent years. 2. While settlement in itself is unproblematic, one notable result has been a 'de-judicialisation' of EU-level enforcement, whereby such cases are shielded from subsequent review by the Union Courts. This has two potential downsides: a precedent problem, and a legitimacy problem. 3. In order to address these concerns while continuing to reap some of the benefits of settlement, this article proposes to give the Court of Justice a greater role in overseeing the Commission's settlement practice, through a judicial pre-approval procedure that might be described as a 'Tunney Act for Europe'.
机译:1.在第1/2003号法规第7条和第9条下,使用解决机制的使用已成为近年来欧洲委员会执法活动最常见的特征之一。 2.虽然定居本身就是毫无疑问,但一个值得注意的结果是欧盟级执法的“解除司法”,因此这种案件被联盟法院随后的审查屏蔽。这有两个潜在的缺点:先例问题,以及合法性问题。 3.为了解决这些问题,同时继续获得一些解决的一些好处,本文通过司法预批准程序向司法审批程序提出司法法院在监督委员会的结算实践方面提出更大的作用欧洲的“唐尼法案”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号