首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health >Common mental disorders and mortality in the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study: comparing the General Health Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
【24h】

Common mental disorders and mortality in the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study: comparing the General Health Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

机译:苏格兰西部20-07研究中的常见精神障碍和死亡率:比较一般健康状况调查表和医院焦虑与抑郁量表

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background While various measures of common mental disorders (CMD) have been found to be associated with mortality, a comparison of how different measures predict mortality may improve our understanding of the association. This paper compares how the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30) predict all cause and cause-specific mortality. Methods Data on 2547 men and women from two cohorts, aged approximately 39 and 55 years, from the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study who were followed up for mortality over an average of 18.9 (SD 5.0) years. Scores were calculated for HADS depression (HADS-D), HADS Anxiety (HADS-A) and GHQ-30. Cox Proportional Hazards Models were used to determine how each CMD measure predicted mortality. Results After adjusting for serious physical illness, smoking, social class, alcohol, obesity, pulse rate and living alone, HRs (95% Cl) per SD increase in score for all-cause mortality were: 1.15 (1.07 to 1.25) for HADS-D; 1.13 (1.04 to 1.23) for GHQ-30 and 1.05 (0.96 to 1.14) for HADS-A. After the same adjustments, cardiovascular disease mortality was also related to HADS-D (HR 1.24 (1.07 to 1.43)), to GHQ-30 (HR 1.24 (1.11 to 1.40)) and to HADS-A (HR 1.15(1.01 to 1.32)); respiratory mortality to GHQ-30 (HR 1.33 (1.13 to 1.55)) and mortality from other causes, excluding injuries, to HADS-D (HR 1.28 (1.05 to 1.55)). Conclusions There were associations between CMD and both all-cause and cause-specific mortality which were broadly similar for GHQ-30 and HADS-D and were still present after adjustment for important confounders and mediators.
机译:背景技术虽然已发现各种常见精神障碍(CMD)量度与死亡率相关,但比较不同量度如何预测死亡率可能会增进我们对该关联的理解。本文比较了医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)和30个项目的一般健康问卷(GHQ-30)如何预测所有原因和特定原因的死亡率。方法来自苏格兰西部20-07研究的两个队列的2547名男性和女性的数据,年龄分别为39岁和55岁,均接受了平均18.9(SD 5.0)年的死亡率随访。计算HADS抑郁(HADS-D),HADS焦虑(HADS-A)和GHQ-30的分数。使用Cox比例危害模型确定每个CMD如何测量预测的死亡率。结果在调整了严重的身体疾病,吸烟,社会阶层,饮酒,肥胖,脉搏率和单独生活后,每位SD的全因死亡率得分的HR(95%Cl)增加:HADS-1.15(1.07至1.25) D; GHQ-30为1.13(1.04至1.23),HADS-A为1.05(0.96至1.14)。经过相同的调整,心血管疾病的死亡率也与HADS-D(HR 1.24(1.07至1.43)),GHQ-30(HR 1.24(1.11至1.40))和HADS-A(HR 1.15(1.01至1.32)有关。 )); GHQ-30的呼吸道死亡率(HR 1.33(1.13至1.55))和HADS-D除伤害以外的其他原因造成的死亡率(HR 1.28(1.05至1.55))。结论CMD与全因病因和特定病因死亡率之间存在关联,GHQ-30和HADS-D广泛相似,并且在对重要的混杂因素和介体进行调整后仍然存在。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health》 |2013年第7期|558-563|共6页
  • 作者单位

    MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK;

    Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London, UK,MRC Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK;

    MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:08:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号