首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environmental psychology >The existential approach to place: Consequences for emotional experience
【24h】

The existential approach to place: Consequences for emotional experience

机译:放置的存在方法:情感体验的后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Few theories and little empirical work has examined specific relationships between kinds of environmental experience and emotional tendencies. We present an existential approach to place that integrates the theories of phenomenological geographers - Edward Relph (1976) and David Seamon (1979) - with those of holistic psychologists - Otto Rank (1945) and Andras Angyal (1965). This synthesis suggests that: (1) people vary in their dispositional sense of person-environment mergence (PEM) with, versus ruminative separation (RS) from, their daily locations; and (2) PEM should be associated with greater guilt proneness, while RS should be associated with greater anxiety proneness. We test this account by developing measures of PEM and RS using factor analytic and scale validation approaches (Study 1); by showing predictive relationships between our measures and extant measures of guilt and anxiety proneness (Study 2); and by experimentally manipulating person-environment mergence versus separation to produce causal effects on emotional experience (Study 3).
机译:很少有理论和实证研究检查了各种环境经验与情绪倾向之间的具体关系。我们提出一种存在的方法,将现象学地理学家爱德华·雷夫(Edward Relph,1976年)和戴维·西蒙(David Seamon,1979年)以及整体心理学家的理论,与奥托·兰克(Otto Rank,1945年)和安德拉斯·安雅(Andras Angyal,1965年)进行整合。这一综合表明:(1)人们在日常环境中的人与环境融合(PEM)的倾向感与反刍动物分离(RS)的倾向不同; (2)PEM应与更大的内gui感相关联,而RS应与更大的内pro感相关联。我们通过使用因子分析和规模验证方法开发PEM和RS的方法来测试此帐户(研究1);通过显示我们的测度与现有的内gui感和焦虑倾向测度之间的预测关系(研究2);并通过实验来控制人与环境的融合与分离,从而对情感体验产生因果关系(研究3)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号