...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environmental biology >Statistical tools for analysing the data obtained from repeated dose toxicity studies with rodents: A comparison of the statistical tools used in Japan with that of used in other countries
【24h】

Statistical tools for analysing the data obtained from repeated dose toxicity studies with rodents: A comparison of the statistical tools used in Japan with that of used in other countries

机译:用于对从啮齿类动物进行反复剂量毒性研究获得的数据进行分析的统计工具:日本和其他国家/地区使用的统计工具的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the present study, an attempt was made to compare the statistical tools used for analysing the data of repeated dose toxicity studies with rodents conducted in 45 countries, with that of Japan. The study revealed that there was no congruence among the countries in the use of statistical tools for analysing the data obtained from the above studies. For example, to analyse the data obtained from repeated dose toxicity studies with rodents, Scheffe's multiple range and Dunnett type (joint type Dunnett) tests are commonly used in Japan, but in other countries use of these statistical tools is not so common. However, statistical techniques used for testing the above data for homogeneity of variance and inter-group comparisons do not differ much between Japan and other countries. In Japan, the data are generally not tested for normality and the same is true with the most of the countries investigated. In the present investigation, out of 127 studies examined, data of only 6 studies were analysed for both homogeneity of variance and normal distribution. For examining homogeneity of variance, we propose Levene's test, since the commonly used Bartlett's test may show heterogeneity in variance in all the groups, if a slight heterogeneity in variance is seen any one of the groups. We suggest the data may be examined for both homogeneity of variance and normal distribution. For the data of the groups that do not show heterogeneity of variance, to find the significant difference among the groups, we recommend Dunnetf s test, and for those show heterogeneity of variance, we recommend Steel's test.
机译:在本研究中,试图与日本在45个国家进行的啮齿动物的重复剂量毒性研究数据进行比较的统计工具进行比较。该研究表明,在使用统计工具来分析从上述研究中获得的数据方面,各国之间并不一致。例如,为分析从啮齿类动物重复剂量毒性研究中获得的数据,在日本通常使用Scheffe的多重范围和Dunnett型(联合型Dunnett)检验,但在其他国家/地区使用这些统计工具并不普遍。但是,在日本与其他国家之间,用于检验上述数据的方差同质性和组间比较的统计技术并没有太大差异。在日本,通常不对数据进行正态检验,在大多数接受调查的国家中也是如此。在本研究中,在所研究的127个研究中,仅对6个研究的数据进行了方差均匀性和正态分布分析。为了检查方差的均一性,我们建议使用Levene检验,因为如果在任一组中都观察到轻微的方差异质性,那么通常使用的Bartlett检验可能会在所有组中显示方差异质性。我们建议可以检查数据的方差均匀性和正态分布。对于未显示方差异质性的组数据,要发现组之间的显着差异,我们建议使用Dunnetf检验,对于那些显示方差异质性的组,我们建议使用Steel检验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号