...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) >A QUESTION OF BALANCE IN INTEGRATED IMPACT ASSESSMENT: NEGOTIATING AWAY THE ENVIRONMENTAL INTEREST IN AUSTRALIA'S BASSLINK PROJECT
【24h】

A QUESTION OF BALANCE IN INTEGRATED IMPACT ASSESSMENT: NEGOTIATING AWAY THE ENVIRONMENTAL INTEREST IN AUSTRALIA'S BASSLINK PROJECT

机译:综合影响评估中的一个平衡问题:与澳大利亚的BASSLINK项目进行环境利益协商

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It is argued that under the guise of integrated impact assessment, environmental capacity and quality is being eroded rather than enhanced. This proposition is examined in the context of a World Heritage Area and an integrated impact assessment process for a major energy infrastructure project in Australia known as Basslink. The case study, which charts the negotiations that took place between a proponent, environmental researchers, consultants, regulators and decision-makers for an environmental flow for the iconic Gordon River in Tasmania, describes the 'balance' that was struck in the name of sustainable development. It demonstrates that, while social and economic benefits tend to be identified as one and the same, the environment is constituted as an oppositional "good". We argue that this outcome is the rule rather than the exception and caution that integrated assessments could serve to 'fast-track' the loss of environmental capacity and quality.n n It is argued that under the guise of integrated impact assessment, environmental capacity andnquality is being eroded rather than enhanced. This proposition is examined in the contextnof a World Heritage Area and an integrated impact assessment process for a major energyninfrastructure project in Australia known as Basslink. The case study, which charts thennegotiations that took place between a proponent, environmental researchers, consultants,nregulators and decision-makers for an environmental flow for the iconic Gordon River innTasmania, describes the ‘balance’ that was struck in the name of sustainable development.nIt demonstrates that, while social and economic benefits tend to be identified as one and thensame, the environment is constituted as an oppositional “good”.We argue that this outcomenis the rule rather than the exception and caution that integrated assessments could serve ton‘fast-track’ the loss of environmental capacity and quality.
机译:有人认为,在综合影响评估的幌子下,环境能力和质量正在受到侵蚀,而不是得到提高。在世界遗产保护区和针对澳大利亚一个称为Basslink的大型能源基础设施项目的综合影响评估流程的背景下,对该提议进行了研究。该案例研究绘制了支持者,环境研究人员,顾问,监管机构和决策者之间就塔斯马尼亚州标志性戈登河的环境流量进行的谈判的图表,描述了以可持​​续性名义达成的“平衡”发展。它表明,尽管社会和经济利益往往被认为是相同的,但环境却构成了对立的“好”。我们认为,这种结果是规则,而非例外,并警告说,综合评估可以“快速”追踪环境能力和质量的损失。nn有人认为,在综合影响评估的幌子下,环境能力和质量是被侵蚀而不是被增强。在世界遗产保护区和针对澳大利亚一个称为Basslink的大型能源基础设施项目的综合影响评估过程的背景下,对该提议进行了研究。该案例研究记录了支持者,环境研究人员,顾问,监管者和决策者之间的谈判,以探讨标志性的戈登河旅馆塔斯马尼亚岛的环境流量,该案例描述了以可持​​续发展为名的“平衡”。 n它表明,尽管社会和经济利益往往被确定为是一个,然后是相同的,但环境却被视为对立的“好”。追踪'环境容量和质量的损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号