首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Documentation >Literature practices: processes leading up to a citation
【24h】

Literature practices: processes leading up to a citation

机译:文学实践:导致被引用的过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose Literature practices represent the process leading up to the citation of a source, and consist of the selection, reading and citing of sources. The purpose of this paper is to explore possible factors that might influence researchers during this process and discover possible consequences of researchers' citation behaviours. Design/methodology/approach In this exploratory study, various factors which could influence literature practices were explored via a questionnaire amongst 112 researchers. Participants were first authors of articles published in 2016 in one of five different journals within the disciplines of experimental psychology, educational sciences and social psychology. Academic positions of the participants ranged from PhD student to full professor. Findings Frequencies and percentages showed that researchers seemed to be influenced in their literature practices by various factors, such as editors suggesting articles and motivation to cite. Additionally, a high percentage of researchers reported taking shortcuts when citing articles (e.g. using secondary citations and reading selectively). Logistic regression did not reveal a clear relationship between academic work experience and research practices. Practical implications Seeing that researchers seem to be influenced by a variety of factors in their literature practices, the scientific community might benefit from better citation practices and guidelines in order to provide more structure to the process of literature practices. Originality/value This paper provides first insights into researchers' literature practices. Possible reasons for problems with citation accuracy and replicating research findings are highlighted. Opportunities for further research on the topic of citation behaviours are presented.
机译:目的文献实践代表了导致文献被引用的过程,并包括文献的选择,阅读和引用。本文的目的是探讨在此过程中可能影响研究人员的可能因素,并发现研究人员的引用行为可能产生的后果。设计/方法/方法在这项探索性研究中,通过问卷调查法对112名研究人员探讨了可能影响文献实践的各种因素。参与者是2016年在实验心理学,教育科学和社会心理学学科的五种不同期刊之一中发表文章的第一作者。参加者的学术职位从博士生到正式教授不等。结果频率和百分比表明研究人员似乎在其文学实践中受到多种因素的影响,例如编辑建议文章和引用动机。此外,高比例的研究人员报告说,在引用文章时会采取捷径(例如使用次要引用并选择性阅读)。 Logistic回归并未揭示学术工作经验与研究实践之间的明确关系。实际意义看到研究人员似乎受到其文学实践中各种因素的影响,科学界可能会从更好的引文实践和指南中受益,以便为文学实践的过程提供更多结构。原创性/价值本文提供了对研究人员文学实践的初步见解。强调了引文准确性和重复研究发现问题的可能原因。提出了进一步研究被引行为的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号