【24h】

The Case for Edge Ethnography

机译:边缘民族志的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Whereas the teaching of qualitative research has long been sacrificed for instruction on quantitative approaches, alternative fieldwork orientations are rarely professed. Edge ethnography represents a strain of qualitative inquiry employing atypical qualitative fieldwork strategies characterized by: (1) the conduct of research within the context of the immediacy of social action, (2) atypical researcher involvement in research settings and activities intentionally maximizing the value of deep involvement, and (3) potential risk to researchers and subjects, as well as related ethical issues raised by close association with active criminals and knowledge of ongoing criminal activity. Despite the strategic value of unconventional qualitative strategies based in full immersion into fieldwork environments, such as entrée to closed and esoteric study settings and contact with otherwise inaccessible subjects, they are seldom employed. Ostensibly, limited application is a function of a lack of coverage in graduate‐level research methods courses—a neglect fostered by multiple issues, including ethical objections. After briefly reviewing the two major forms of alternative qualitative fieldwork, the principal advantages and ethical justification for engaging edge ethnography are presented.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2010.516566
机译:定性研究的教学长期以来一直被用于定量方法的指导,而很少有人选择替代性的野外工作方向。边缘人种志代表了使用非典型定性野外工作策略进行的定性探究,其特征是:(1)在社会行动的即时性背景下进行研究;(2)非典型研究人员参与研究环境和活动,有意使深层价值最大化参与,以及(3)研究人员和受试者的潜在风险,以及与活跃的犯罪分子密切相关并了解正在进行的犯罪活动而引发的有关道德问题。尽管基于完全融入野外工作环境的非常规定性策略具有战略价值,例如进入封闭而深奥的学习环境并与否则无法访问的主题进行接触,但很少使用它们。从表面上看,有限的申请是由于研究生水平的研究方法课程缺乏覆盖面而造成的,这种忽视是由多个问题(包括道德异议)引起的。在简要回顾了替代性定性田野调查的两种主要形式之后,提出了从事边际民族志的主要优势和道德依据。查看全文下载全文相关var addthis_config = { twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,发布:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2010.516566

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号