...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Constructional Steel Research >Experimental and analytical evaluation of the redundancy of repurposed fracture-critical railroad-flatcars
【24h】

Experimental and analytical evaluation of the redundancy of repurposed fracture-critical railroad-flatcars

机译:重用的断裂关键型铁路平板车冗余性的实验和分析评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous research focused on the development of guidelines to load rate highway bridges constructed out of repurposed railroad flatcars (RRFCs). Those guidelines were based on field testing and finite element analysis conducted on existing RRFC bridges both in the field and in the lab. However, load rating is only one of the issues related to RRFCs as the main components are often classified as fracture critical members (FCMs) since there are only two flatcars in the cross section in most instances. Classifying the individual RRFCs as FCMs requires a rigorous hands-on inspection as per the Code of Federal Regulations, which greatly increases the long-term costs associated with these structures. Hence, while they are attractive to many owners due to their low initial costs and considerable strength, long-term costs due to inspection have deterred some owners from utilizing this viable and renewable alternative for low-volume applications. This paper presents the results of laboratory testing and non-linear finite element analysis of a railroad flatcar bridge specimen constructed with a composite reinforced concrete deck. The results confirm that RRFCs have considerable reserve strength and adequate load redundancy in a severely faulted state and need not be classified as FCMs if certain requirements are met. The paper also presents recommendations for load redistribution factors between primary members of RRFCs obtained through the experimental and verified by numerical studies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:先前的研究集中在开发由改型铁路平板车(RRFC)建造的公路桥梁的荷载率指南。这些准则基于在现场和实验室中对现有RRFC桥接器进行的现场测试和有限元分析。但是,额定载荷只是与RRFC相关的问题之一,因为在大多数情况下,横截面中只有两个平板车,因此主要部件经常被归类为断裂关键构件(FCM)。将各个RRFC归类为FCM需要根据《联邦法规》进行严格的动手检查,这大大增加了与这些结构相关的长期成本。因此,尽管由于其较低的初始成本和相当大的强度而对许多所有者具有吸引力,但由于检查而产生的长期成本已阻止了某些所有者将这种可行且可再生的替代方案用于小批量应用。本文介绍了使用复合钢筋混凝土面板建造的铁路平板车桥梁标本的实验室测试结果和非线性有限元分析结果。结果证实,RRFC在严重故障状态下具有相当大的保留强度和足够的负载冗余,并且如果满足某些要求,则无需将其分类为FCM。本文还针对通过实验获得并通过数值研究验证的RRFC主要成员之间的负载重新分配因子提出了建议。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号