...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Constructional Steel Research >Experimental and analytical evaluation of the redundancy of repurposed fracture-critical railroad-flatcars
【24h】

Experimental and analytical evaluation of the redundancy of repurposed fracture-critical railroad-flatcars

机译:重新裂缝 - 临界铁路平台冗余的实验分析评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Previous research focused on the development of guidelines to load rate highway bridges constructed out of repurposed railroad flatcars (RRFCs). Those guidelines were based on field testing and finite element analysis conducted on existing RRFC bridges both in the field and in the lab. However, load rating is only one of the issues related to RRFCs as the main components are often classified as fracture critical members (FCMs) since there are only two flatcars in the cross section in most instances. Classifying the individual RRFCs as FCMs requires a rigorous hands-on inspection as per the Code of Federal Regulations, which greatly increases the long-term costs associated with these structures. Hence, while they are attractive to many owners due to their low initial costs and considerable strength, long-term costs due to inspection have deterred some owners from utilizing this viable and renewable alternative for low-volume applications. This paper presents the results of laboratory testing and non-linear finite element analysis of a railroad flatcar bridge specimen constructed with a composite reinforced concrete deck. The results confirm that RRFCs have considerable reserve strength and adequate load redundancy in a severely faulted state and need not be classified as FCMs if certain requirements are met. The paper also presents recommendations for load redistribution factors between primary members of RRFCs obtained through the experimental and verified by numerical studies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:以前的研究侧重于制定加载率高速公路桥梁的准则,该桥梁由重新展示的铁路平台(RRFC)构成。这些指南基于现场测试和在现有RRFC桥梁和实验室中进行的现有RRFC桥接的有限元分析。然而,负载评级只是与RRFC相关的问题之一,因为主要组件通常被分类为裂缝关键成员(FCMS),因为大多数情况下横截面中只有两个平板电脑。根据FCMS对个人RRFC进行分类,要求根据联邦法规的守则进行严格的动手检查,这大大提高了与这些结构相关的长期成本。因此,虽然他们对许多业主具有吸引力,但由于其初始成本低,因此,由于检查而导致的长期成本阻碍了一些业主利用这种可行和可再生的替代品进行低批量应用。本文介绍了用复合钢筋混凝土甲板构建的铁路平面桥标本的实验室检测和非线性有限元分析的结果。结果证实,RRFC在严重故障状态下具有相当大的储备强度和充足的负载冗余,如果满足某些要求,则不需要将不被归类为FCMS。本文还展示了通过实验和通过数值研究验证获得的RRFC的主要成员之间的负载再分布因子的建议。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号