首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Pathology >A core needle biopsy provides more malignancy-specific results than fine-needle aspiration biopsy in thyroid nodules suspicious for malignancy
【24h】

A core needle biopsy provides more malignancy-specific results than fine-needle aspiration biopsy in thyroid nodules suspicious for malignancy

机译:与可疑恶性甲状腺结节的细针穿刺活检相比,穿刺针活检可提供更多的恶性特异性结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background and aims The most commonly used diagnostic method for the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules is ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNA), which often yields non-diagnostic or non-definitive results and seldom produces definite malignant diagnoses. To improve upon the malignancy-specific sensitivity, we tested core needle biopsies (CNBs) of thyroid lesions taken from surgical specimens. Material and methods 52 consecutive patients with malignant or malignant-suspicious thyroid nodules were referred to Tampere University Hospital between May 2010 and December 2011. Preoperative FNAs were categorised as follicular neoplasm (48%), suspicion for malignancy (46%) or malignancy (6%). Intraoperative FNA and CNB samples were acquired from surgical specimens removed during surgery. The results of the needle biopsies were compared with the final pathological diagnosis. Results CNBs had a high definitive sensitivity for malignancy (61%, CI 41% to 78%) whereas the definitive sensitivity for malignancy of FNAs was significantly lower (22%, CI 10% to 42%). CNB was not beneficial in the diagnosis of follicular thyroid lesions. When all suspected follicular tumours were excluded, the definitive sensitivity of CNB rose to 70% (CI 48% to 86%). Conclusions CNB may be beneficial for the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma and other non-follicular thyroid lesions. CNB may be considered as an additional diagnostic procedure in cases with FNA suspicious for malignancy.
机译:背景和目的术前甲状腺结节最常用的诊断方法是超声引导下的细针穿刺活检(FNA),通常可产生非诊断性或不确定性结果,很少能做出明确的恶性诊断。为了提高对恶性肿瘤的特异性敏感性,我们测试了取自手术标本的甲状腺病变的核心针穿刺活检(CNB)。材料和方法自2010年5月至2011年12月,将52例连续的恶性或可疑甲状腺结节患者转诊至坦佩雷大学医院。术前FNA分为滤泡性肿瘤(48%),怀疑为恶性(46%)或恶性(6)。 %)。术中FNA和CNB样品是从手术期间取出的手术标本中获取的。将穿刺活检的结果与最终的病理诊断进行比较。结果CNBs对恶性肿瘤的确定敏感性较高(61%,CI为41%至78%),而FNA对恶性肿瘤的确定性敏感性则较低(22%,CI为10%至42%)。 CNB对甲状腺滤泡性病变的诊断无益。当排除所有疑似滤泡性肿瘤时,CNB的确定敏感性上升至70%(CI为48%至86%)。结论CNB可能对甲状腺乳头状癌及其他非滤泡性甲状腺病变的诊断有帮助。在FNA可疑为恶性肿瘤的情况下,CNB可被视为一种附加的诊断程序。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Clinical Pathology》 |2013年第12期|1046-1050|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 2000, Tampere FI-33521, Finland,University of Tampere, School of Medicine, Tampere, Finland;

    Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland;

    University of Tampere, School of Medicine, Tampere, Finland,Division of Surgery, Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland;

    Department of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland;

    University of Tampere, School of Medicine, Tampere, Finland,Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:34:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号