首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Pathology >Assessment of suitability of the one step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay as an intraoperative procedure for detection of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer
【24h】

Assessment of suitability of the one step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay as an intraoperative procedure for detection of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer

机译:评估一步核酸扩增(OSNA)分析作为乳腺癌术前淋巴结转移检测的术中程序的适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim We aimed to assess the one step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay as an intraoperative method in comparison with frozen sections (FS) for detection of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of breast cancer. Method 100 SLNs from patients with breast carcinoma were enrolled within a 3-month period. Alternate 2 mm node slices were subjected to routine FS, and later to permanent histology, and the rest for automated molecular detection of CK19 mRNA using OSNA. FS and OSNA findings were compared with permanent histology results. Difference in turnaround time was also noted. Results With permanent histology as gold standard, OSNA was discrepant in 8 of 98 (3 false negative, 5 false positive) included SLNs whereas FS had 2 false negative cases. FS had higher sensitivity (89%, p=<0.001), specificity (100%, p=0.001) and concordance rate (98%) than OSNA (83%, 94% and 92%, respectively). FS showed almost perfect agreement (κ=0.929) whereas OSNA showed substantial agreement (κ=0.740) when compared with permanent histology. OSNA turnaround time was twice longer (mean of 47.7 min) than FS. Conclusions Automation of SLN assessment using OSNA is a potentially useful intraoperative diagnostic tool with acceptable accuracy. Discordant findings in this study may be due to sampling allocation. Since OSNA is more time-consuming, its practical advantage over routine FS requires further study in view of current technical workflow considerations.
机译:目的我们旨在评估一步法核酸扩增(OSNA)分析作为一种术中方法,与冷冻切片(FS)进行比较,以检测乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)中的转移。方法在3个月内纳入100例来自乳腺癌患者的SLN。交替的2 mm结节切片经过常规FS处理,之后进行永久组织学检查,其余部分用于使用OSNA自动检测CK19 mRNA。将FS和OSNA的发现与永久组织学结果进行比较。还注意到周转时间的差异。结果以永久组织学为金标准,OSNA在98例中有8例(假阴性3例,假阳性5例)中有差异,而FS有2例假阴性。 FS比OSNA(分别为83%,94%和92%)具有更高的敏感性(89%,p = <0.001),特异性(100%,p = 0.001)和一致率(98%)。与永久组织学相比,FS显示出几乎完美的一致性(κ= 0.929),而OSNA显示出基本一致性(κ= 0.740)。 OSNA的周转时间比FS长两倍(平均47.7分钟)。结论使用OSNA进行SLN评估自动化是一种潜在的有用的术中诊断工具,其准确性可以接受。本研究中不一致的发现可能是由于抽样分配所致。由于OSNA更加耗时,因此,鉴于当前的技术工作流考虑因素,它比常规FS的实际优势需要进一步研究。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Clinical Pathology》 |2014年第12期|1032-1037|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore;

    Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore;

    Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore;

    Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore;

    Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Singapore, Singapore;

    Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Singapore, Singapore;

    Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Singapore, Singapore;

    Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Singapore, Singapore;

    Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore;

    Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore;

    Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore;

    Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Academia, Level 7, Diagnostics Tower, Singapore 169856, Singapore;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:33:21

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号