首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Comparing the environmental efficiency of milk and beef production through life cycle assessment of interconnected cattle systems
【24h】

Comparing the environmental efficiency of milk and beef production through life cycle assessment of interconnected cattle systems

机译:通过互联牛系统生命周期评估比较牛奶和牛肉生产的环境效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dairy production has a substantial environmental impact. Currently, most studies analysing the environmental burdens of milk production employ attributional Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), for cradle to farm-gate analysis of dairy systems. This approach calculates environmental footprints per kg fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM). However, milk and beef production are inherently interconnected, and a narrow focus on milk production neglects wider synergies and trade-offs across cattle systems, outside dairy farm boundaries. For the first time, we applied an expanded boundary LCA of coupled dairy and beef production in Latin America, considering 1 kg FPCM plus 100 g of beef as functional unit (FU) to reflect the current global beef:milk demand ratio and taking into account the complexities of Costa Rican cattle production systems. Boundaries encompassed fattening of surplus dairy calves and incurred or avoided suckler-beef production needed to deliver the FU. A database of 552 Costa Rican farms (203 beef and 349 dairy farms) was analysed using a farm LCA model to generate results across five impact categories (Global Warming Potential - GWP; Eutrophication; Acidification; Abiotic Resource Depletion; and Land Occupation - LO). Normalised scores indicated that cattle systems contribute most strongly to per capita GWP and LO burdens. Cradle to farm-gate attributional LCA showed that milk produced by dual-purpose farms had the largest GWP and LO footprints, whilst specialist farms had the smallest footprints, per kg FPCM. The expanded boundary LCA showed that dual-purpose farms generated smaller GWP footprints per kg FPCM plus 100 g beef than specialised dairy farms, though still required more land. Key factors were the herd structure, influencing the amount of beef produced, and milk yields per animal, reflecting the level of dairy specialisation. This new evidence on the environmental efficiency of cattle production systems emphasises the imperative to consider both milk and beef production as well as multiple environmental pressures across interconnected milk and beef production systems when designing sustainable intensification mitigation strategies. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:乳制品生产具有大量的环境影响。目前,大多数研究分析了牛奶产量的环境负担雇用归属生命周期评估(LCA),用于乳房系统的农场栅极分析。该方法计算每公斤脂肪和蛋白质矫正牛奶(FPCM)的环境足迹。然而,牛奶和牛肉生产本质上是互联的,并且对牛奶生产的狭隘关注忽视牛奶系统外的更广泛的协同作用和权衡。我们首次应用了拉丁美洲的耦合乳制品和牛肉生产的扩展边界LCA,考虑了1公斤FPCM加上100克牛肉作为功能单元(FU),以反映当前的全球牛肉:牛奶需求比率并考虑到哥斯达黎加牛生产系统的复杂性。边界包括剩余乳制牛犊的育肥,并产生或避免牛肉生产需要提供福。使用农场LCA模型进行分析552哥斯达黎加农场(203牛肉和349个乳制农场)的数据库,以产生跨五个影响类别的结果(全球变暖潜力 - GWP;富营养化;酸化;非生物资源耗尽;和土地占用 - LO) 。规范化分数表明,牛系统对人均GWP和Lo负担最强烈贡献。摇篮到农场attage atticulational LCA表明,二元农场生产的牛奶具有最大的GWP和Lo足迹,而专业农场具有最小的脚印,每公斤FPCM。扩展边界LCA表明,二零类农场每公斤FPCM产生较小的GWP占地面积,而不是专门的乳制品农场,但仍需要更多的土地。关键因素是畜群结构,影响生产的牛肉量,每只动物产量和牛奶产量,反映了乳制品专业化水平。这种关于牛生产系统环境效率的新证据强调了在设计可持续增压缓解策略时,必须考虑牛奶和牛肉生产以及跨越牛奶和牛肉生产系统的多种环境压力。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号