首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Evaluation of cradle to gate environmental impact of frozen green bean production by means of life cycle assessment
【24h】

Evaluation of cradle to gate environmental impact of frozen green bean production by means of life cycle assessment

机译:通过生命周期评估评估摇篮到门对冷冻绿豆生产的环境影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The main objective of this study is to assess the impact of frozen green bean production and processing. The analysis and relative information collected regards a medium industry located in the south of Marche region (Italy) and the whole production system, from field to industry, is in a range of about 100 km between Marche and Abruzzo regions. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of 1 kg of frozen green bean for two different cultivation protocols for herbicides and pesticides application in order to assess the possible advantages due to shifting to different field treatments. The baseline scenario (A) considers the application of two herbicides (Pendimethalin and Linuron) and two pesticides (Altacor and Azoxystrobin), the alternative scenario (B) considers one herbicides application (Clomazone) and two pesticides (Emamectine and Azoxystrobin).The analysis has been conducted following ISO 14040 and 14044 on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Product Category Rules for arable crops v. 2.0. LCI (Life Cycle Inventory) and LCIA (Life Cycle Impact Assessment) phase have been performed using LCA software SimaPro (R) v. 8.2.3.0 with updated databases. The most used databases for this study are Ecoinvent 3 and Agri-footprint, LCI data have been collected through interviews, consulting official documents and company management programs. The system boundaries considered includes crop production, transport to industry plant and industry processing and all the data are referred to 2014 crop season. Crop production LCI considers seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, field activities, yield and relative emissions. Transportations covers distances and payload with empty return. Industry phase considers transformation efficiency, energy, fuels, water. The function of the production chain is to provide frozen green bean, no coproduct or by-product were produced. Residues and product losses from industry processing are managed by anaerobic digestion as waste. Plastics and other wastes from field and industry has been treated by landfill. Data regarding field phase were collected by interviews and consulting official management documents from 43 farms. Data regarding industrial phase have been gathered from automated management systems hardware/software AS/400 (IBM).The LCIA results for 1 kg of frozen green been show an impact of about 0.7 kg of CO2 eq for GWP, 1.9E-4 kg of C2H4 eq kg for PCOP, 3.5E-3 kg of SO2 eq for AP and 1.7E-3 kg of PO43- for EP. The analysis conducted comparing two different solutions of plant protection and herbicides application shows how solution A has a lower impact on ADP, ADP fossil, GWP 100yr, ODP, MEP, PCOP, AP and EP from 0.04% to 11% about. On the other hand, solution B has a lower impact on HTP, FEP, MEP and TEP between 4 and 40%.The analysis conducted shows the impact of frozen green been at industry level representative of medium size processing plant with average technology. The only information available in literature are limited to open field production impact assessment of raw green bean without any kind of industry transformation. . Simply replacing herbicide treatment and one pesticide application, for preventing weed and pest resistance, there is a consistent reduction of impact on different categories for ecotoxicity group without increasing too much the impact on other categories considered. The only exception can be found for ADP category in which the impact of alternative scenario (B) is higher than baseline (A). The reason lies in the lower active ingredient concentration and higher amount of commercial product used for solution B. From the analysis remains evident the contribution on ADP fossil, GWP and ODP due to energy used in industrial phase. On the other side field phase contributes more on ADP, HTP, FEP, AP and EP. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是评估冷冻绿豆生产和加工的影响。分析和收集的相关信息涉及位于马尔凯地区(意大利)南部的中等产业,整个生产系统(从现场到工业)在马尔凯和阿布鲁佐地区之间的距离约为100公里。这项研究的目的是评估1 kg冷冻绿豆对两种不同的除草剂和杀虫剂栽培方案的影响,以评估因转向不同田间处理而可能带来的好处。基准情景(A)考虑使用两种除草剂(苯达美林和利奴隆)和两种农药(Altacor和Azoxystrobin),替代情景(B)考虑使用一种除草剂(Clomazone)和两种农药(Emamectine和Azoxystrobin)。遵循ISO 14040和14044关于生命周期评估(LCA)和耕作作物产品类别规则v。2.0的规定进行。已使用带有更新数据库的LCA软件SimaPro(R)v。8.2.3.0执行LCI(生命周期清单)和LCIA(生命周期影响评估)阶段。这项研究最常用的数据库是Ecoinvent 3和Agri-footprint,LCI数据是通过访谈,咨询官方文件和公司管理计划收集的。所考虑的系统范围包括作物生产,工厂运输和工业加工,所有数据均参考2014作物季节。作物生产LCI考虑种子,肥料,农药,田间活动,产量和相对排放量。运输涵盖了空载的距离和有效载荷。工业阶段考虑转换效率,能源,燃料,水。生产链的功能是提供冷冻生豆,没有副产品或副产品产生。工业处理过程中产生的残留物和产品损失通过厌氧消化作为废物进行管理。来自田野和工业的塑料和其他废物已经通过填埋处理。有关田间阶段的数据是通过采访和咨询来自43个农场的官方管理文件收集的。有关工业阶段的数据是从自动化管理系统硬件/软件AS / 400(IBM)收集的。LCIA的1 kg冷冻绿色的LCIA结果表明,全球升温潜能值对大约0.7 kg CO2当量,1.9E-4 kg CO2当量的影响PCOP的C2H4当量kg,AP的SO2当量3.5E-3 kg,EP的1.7E-3 kg PO43-。通过比较两种不同的植物保护和除草剂解决方案进行的分析表明,溶液A对ADP,ADP化石,GWP 100yr,ODP,MEP,PCOP,AP和EP的影响从0.04%降至11%左右。另一方面,溶液B对HTP,FEP,MEP和TEP的影响较小,在4%至40%之间。进行的分析表明,冷冻绿色的影响一直代表具有中等技术水平的中等规模加工厂的工业水平。文献中可获得的唯一信息仅限于未经任何行业转换的生绿豆的露天生产影响评估。 。简单地代替除草剂处理和一种农药施用,以防止杂草和害虫的危害,就可以不断减少对生态毒性组别不同类别的影响,而又不会增加对其他类别的影响。对于替代方案(B)的影响高于基准(A)的ADP类别,可以找到唯一的例外。原因在于溶液B中的有效成分浓度较低,而商业产品的用量较高。从分析中仍然可以看出,工业阶段使用的能源对ADP化石,GWP和ODP的贡献。另一方面,现场阶段对ADP,HTP,FEP,AP和EP的贡献更大。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号