...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Measuring the maturity of carbon market in China: An entropy-based TOPSIS approach
【24h】

Measuring the maturity of carbon market in China: An entropy-based TOPSIS approach

机译:衡量中国碳市场的成熟度:基于熵的TOPSIS方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, we construct an evaluation index system in terms of three dimensions including internal, external and interface factors. We propose an entropy-based TOPSIS model to measure the maturity of carbon market. The proposed model uses the entropy method to objectively weight the indicators, and the TOPSIS method to measure the maturity of carbon market. Taking China's seven pilot carbon markets from 2013 to 2017 as an example, the empirical results are that the overall maturity of China's pilot carbon markets is relatively low, for the sake of small market size, low market effectiveness, low market activeness and high price volatility. Moreover, due to the difference in the quotas transaction volume, market liquidity and market supporting facilities, there are obvious differences in maturities among China's seven pilot carbon markets. In 2017, the maturity of Hubei market is the highest, reaching 0.6146. The maturity of Guangdong, Shenzhen, Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin reaches 0.6108, 0.5022, 0.4351, 0.4267 and 0.3888 respectively. The maturity of Chongqing market is the only 0.3633, at the lowest level. What's more, from the perspective of maturity evolution trend, Hubei, Guangdong and Shenzhen fluctuate upward from the market opening to 2017 and steadily rank in the top three. Shanghai and Tianjin show a U-shaped growth trend, declining from 2013 to 2015 and continuing to rise from 2015 to 2017. Beijing shows a fluctuating downward trend from 2013 to 2017, while ranking fourth. Chongqing ranks relatively low, but it shows an escalating trend. Finally, several targeted policy implications are put forward to enhance the maturities of carbon markets. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在本研究中,我们从内部,外部和界面因素三个维度构建评估指标体系。我们提出了一种基于熵的TOPSIS模型来衡量碳市场的成熟度。所提出的模型使用熵方法客观地衡量指标,使用TOPSIS方法来衡量碳市场的成熟度。以2013年至2017年中国七个试点碳市场为例,实证结果是,由于市场规模小,市场有效性低,市场活跃度低和价格波动大,中国试点碳市场的整体成熟度相对较低。 。此外,由于配额交易量,市场流动性和市场支持设施的差异,中国七个试点碳市场的到期日也存在明显差异。 2017年,湖北市场成熟度最高,达到0.6146。广东,深圳,北京,上海和天津的到期日分别达到0.6108、0.5022、0.4351、0.4267和0.3888。重庆市场的成熟度仅为0.3633,处于最低水平。此外,从期限演变趋势来看,湖北,广东和深圳从市场开放到2017年都有波动,稳居前三名。上海和天津呈现U型增长趋势,2013年至2015年呈下降趋势,2015年至2017年呈持续上升趋势。北京从2013年至2017年呈下降趋势波动,排名第四。重庆排名相对较低,但呈上升趋势。最后,提出了一些有针对性的政策含义,以增强碳市场的成熟度。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2019年第20期|94-103|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Guilin Univ Elect Technol, Business Sch, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China;

    Guilin Univ Elect Technol, Business Sch, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China;

    Guilin Univ Elect Technol, Business Sch, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China|Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Business Sch, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China;

    Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Hunan Engn Res Ctr Ind Big Data & Intelligent Dec, Xiangtan 411201, Peoples R China;

    Jinan Univ, Management Sch, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Carbon market maturity; Entropy-based TOPSIS model; China's pilot carbon markets;

    机译:碳市场成熟度;基于熵的TOPSIS模型;中国碳市场试点;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号