首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Locus of Control and the Moral Reasoning of Managers
【24h】

Locus of Control and the Moral Reasoning of Managers

机译:控制源和管理者的道德推理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Rotter's theory of internal-external locus of control evolved from Carl Jung's work. In Psychological Types (1923), Jung defined two opposing tendencies in personality: introversion and extroversion. While both tendencies are present in all individuals, one tends to dominate the other. The internal-external control construct was conceived as a generalized expectancy to perceive reinforcement either as contingent upon one's own behaviors (internal control) or as the result of forces beyond one's control, such as chance, fate, or powerful others (external control) (Lefcourt, 1981, p. 15). Locus of control refers to those causes to which individuals attribute their successes and failures. Individuals are responsive to some external motivators (e.g. better jobs, promotions, higher salaries), but the more powerful are internal pressures (the desire for increased job satisfaction, self-esteem, and quality of life). Research indicates that an individual's internal—external locus of control impacts their ethical behavior in an organization. Rotter's I-E Scale (1966, Psychological Monographics 80(1), 1-28), a 29 item forced choice instrument, is the most widely used instrument to measure the degree of internality versus externality. Each respondent's score for this scale had a potential range from 0 to 23. As there are six filler items used to mask the intent of the questionnaire a score of 23 being extremely external in nature and a score of zero being extremely internal in nature. The I Scale (Internal Scale) measures the extent to which people believe that they have control over their own lives; the E Scale (External Scale) measures the extent to which people believe that they do not have control over their own lives. This study utilized the I-E Scale. Jones (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation) and Deflumeri (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation) investigated the likelihood of an individual to engage in unethical behavior in an organization. This research suggests that when employees perceive that locus of control resides internally they themselves decide what is appropriate behavior, but with an external locus of control, employees will look at others to decide appropriate behavior. The researcher in this study investigated the relationship between managers' locus of control and their moral reasoning.
机译:罗特的控制内外部轨迹理论是从卡尔·荣格的著作发展而来的。在《心理类型》(《心理类型》,1923年)中,荣格定义了两种相反的人格倾向:内向和外向。虽然两种趋势都存在于所有个体中,但一种趋于主导另一种。内部-外部控制构造被认为是一种普遍的期望,可以将增强感知为是取决于自己的行为(内部控制),还是由于无法控制的力量(例如机会,命运或强大的他人)(外部控制)的结果( Lefcourt,1981年,第15页)。控制源是指个人将其成功和失败归因于这些原因。个人对某些外部动机(例如,更好的工作,晋升,更高的薪水)有反应,但内部压力(对提高工作满意度,自尊心和生活质量的渴望)则更有力量。研究表明,个人的内部-外部控制源会影响他们在组织中的道德行为。 Rotter的I-E量表(1966,Psychological Monographics 80(1),1-28)是一项29项强制选择工具,是衡量内部程度与外部程度的最广泛使用的工具。每个受访者在这个量表上的得分可能在0到23之间。由于有6个填充项用来掩盖问卷的意图,因此23分本质上是极端外部的,零分本质上是极端内部的。 I量表(内部量表)用于衡量人们认为自己能够控制自己的生活的程度; E量表(外部量表)用于衡量人们认为自己无法控制自己的生活的程度。这项研究利用了I-E量表。 Jones(未发表的博士学位论文)和Deflumeri(未发表的博士学位论文)研究了个人在组织中从事不道德行为的可能性。这项研究表明,当员工意识到控制源位于内部时,他们自己会决定什么是适当的行为,而在外部控制源的情况下,员工会看着其他人来决定适当的行为。本研究的研究者调查了经理的控制源与他们的道德推理之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号