首页> 外文期刊>Journal of business & industrial marketing >Marketing strategy selection, marketing metrics, and firm performance
【24h】

Marketing strategy selection, marketing metrics, and firm performance

机译:营销策略选择,营销指标和公司绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This research aims to investigate the relationship between customer-based performance measures (marketing measures of firm success)rnand business growth performance (strategy measures of firm success), in the context of strategic marketing positioning decisions and suggestsrncustomer-based metrics may play a key role in measuring overall business achievements.rnDesign/methodology/approach - This is an empirical survey of 209 business-to-business services firms.rnFindings - Customer-based performance (marketing measures) is associated with the choice of generic positioning and segmentation strategies, whilernstrategic positioning choice (i.e. low-cost vs differentiation) is indirectly, rather than directly, associated with business growth performance. The "both"rnstrategy, where firms simultaneously pursue both low-cost and differentiated strategies, leads to improved performance in these B2B services firms.rnResearch limitations/implications - The study potentially has industry- and/or service-specific limitations.rnPractical implications - This research suggests that firms that cannot measure performance at the customer level may be failing to understand thernoutcomes of successful marketing programs and decisions. In addition, this research suggests that both operational efficiency and differentiation arernkeys to growth in B2B services.rnOriginality/value - This study reinforces the continued applicability of Porter's generic positioning and segmentation strategies for B2B services butrnsuggests that performance differences between strategies in this context are best captured using a customer-based measure (share of wallet, lifetimernvalue, retention rate and return on marketing investment) rather than a more general business growth measure.
机译:目的-这项研究旨在研究在战略营销定位决策的背景下,基于客户的绩效指标(企业成功的营销指标)和业务增长绩效(企业成功的战略指标)之间的关系,并建议以客户为基础的指标设计/方法/方法-这是对209家企业对企业服务公司的实证调查。研究-基于客户的绩效(营销手段)与通用定位和细分策略的选择相关,而战略性的定位选择(即低成本与差异化)则与业务增长绩效间接而非直接相关。公司同时采用低成本策略和差异化策略的“两种”策略会导致这些B2B服务公司的绩效提高。rn研究局限性/含义-该研究可能具有行业和/或服务特定的局限性。rn实践意义-这项研究表明,无法在客户层面衡量绩效的公司可能无法理解成功的营销计划和决策的结果。此外,这项研究表明运营效率和差异化都是B2B服务增长的关键。原创性/价值-这项研究加强了波特对B2B服务的通用定位和细分策略的持续适用性,但建议在这种情况下,策略之间的性能差异最好使用基于客户的度量(钱包份额,生命周期价值,保留率和营销投资回报)​​来捕获,而不是更一般的业务增长度量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号