...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders >Asperger’s Syndrome: A Comparison of Clinical Diagnoses and Those Made According to the ICD-10 and DSM-IV
【24h】

Asperger’s Syndrome: A Comparison of Clinical Diagnoses and Those Made According to the ICD-10 and DSM-IV

机译:阿斯伯格综合症:临床诊断与根据ICD-10和DSM-IV进行的诊断比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The diagnostic criteria for Asperger Syndrome (AS) according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV have been criticized as being too narrow in view of the rules of onset and precedence, whereby autism takes precedence over AS in a diagnostic hierarchy. In order to investigate this further, cases from the DSM-IV multicenter study who had been diagnosed clinically with AS were assigned to appropriate DSM-IV/ICD-10 diagnostic categories. The analysis indicated that 11(23%) cases would be reassigned a diagnosis of autism by either ICD-10 or DSM-IV according to their onset and precedence rules, and 33(68%) would be diagnosed with AS. These results contrast with those of others who have stated that the diagnosis of AS using ICD-10/DSM-IV criteria is ‘virtually impossible’. It is suggested that this is due to limitations inherent in these criteria, and alternative conceptualizations are discussed.
机译:鉴于起病和优先顺序的规则,根据ICD-10和DSM-IV的阿斯伯格综合症(AS)的诊断标准被批评为过于狭窄,在诊断层次中自闭症的优先级高于AS。为了对此进行进一步调查,将DSM-IV多中心研究中经临床诊断为AS的病例分配到适当的DSM-IV / ICD-10诊断类别。分析表明,ICD-10或DSM-IV将根据其发病和优先顺序将11例(23%)病例重新分配为自闭症诊断,而33例(68%)病例将被诊断为AS。这些结果与其他人所说的使用ICD-10 / DSM-IV标准诊断AS是“几乎不可能”的对比。建议这是由于这些标准固有的局限性,并讨论了其他概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号