首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the air & waste management association >Using Backup Generators for Meeting Peak Electricity Demand: A Sensitivity Analysis on Emission Controls, Location, and Health Endpoints
【24h】

Using Backup Generators for Meeting Peak Electricity Demand: A Sensitivity Analysis on Emission Controls, Location, and Health Endpoints

机译:使用备用发电机满足峰值用电需求:对排放控制,位置和健康终点的敏感性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Generators installed for backup power during blackouts could help satisfy peak electricity demand; however, many are diesel generators with nonnegligible air emissions that may damage air quality and human health. The full (private and social) cost of using diesel generators with and without emission control retrofits for fine par-ticulate matter (PM_(2.5)) and nitrogen oxides (NO_x) were compared with a new natural gas turbine peaking plant. Lower private costs were found for the backup generators because the capital costs are mostly ascribed to reliability. To estimate the social costs from air quality, the changes in ambient concentrations of ozone (O_3) and PM_(2.5) were modeled using the Particulate Matter Comprehensive Air Quality Model with extensions (PMCAM_x) chemical transport model. These air quality changes were translated to their equivalent human health effects using concentration-response functions and then into dollars using estimates of "willingness-to-pay" to avoid ill health. As a case study, 1000 MW of backup generation operating for 12 hr/day for 6 days in each of four eastern U.S. cities (Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, and New York) was modeled. In all cities, modeled PM_(2.5) concentrations increased (up to 5 μg/m~3) due mainly to primary emissions. Smaller increases and decreases were observed for secondary PM_(2.5) with more variation between cities. Increases in NO_x emissions resulted in significant nitrate formation (up torn1 μg/m~3) in Atlanta and Chicago. The NO_x emissions also caused O_3 decreases in the urban centers and increases in the surrounding areas. For PM_(2.5), a social cost of approximately $2/kWh was calculated for uncontrolled diesel generators in highly populated cities but was under 10 ¢/kWh with PM_(2.5) and NO_x controls. On a full cost basis, it was found that properly controlled diesel generators are cost-effective for meeting peak electricity demand. The authors recommend NO_x and PM_(2.5) controls.
机译:在停电期间安装备用发电机的发电机可以帮助满足峰值用电需求;但是,许多柴油发电机的废气排放量微不足道,可能会损害空气质量和人体健康。比较了使用柴油发电机对精细颗粒物(PM_(2.5)和氮氧化物(NO_x)进行排放控制和不进行排放控制的全部(私人和社会)成本,与新建的天然气涡轮调峰装置进行了比较。发现备用发电机的私人成本较低,因为资本成本主要归因于可靠性。为了从空气质量中估算社会成本,使用带有扩展的颗粒物综合空气质量模型(PMCAM_x)的化学迁移模型来模拟环境臭氧浓度(O_3)和PM_(2.5)的变化。使用浓度响应函数将这些空气质量变化转换为它们等效的人类健康影响,然后使用“支付意愿”的估算值转换为美元,以避免不良健康。作为案例研究,对美国四个东部城市(亚特兰大,芝加哥,达拉斯和纽约)中每个城市的1000 MW备用电源,每天运行12个小时,连续6天进行建模。在所有城市中,模拟的PM_(2.5)浓度增加(高达5μg/ m〜3)主要是由于一次排放。次级PM_(2.5)的增加和减少较小,城市之间的差异更大。 NO_x排放量的增加导致亚特兰大和芝加哥的硝酸盐大量形成(高达1μg/ m〜3)。 NO_x排放还导致O_3在城市中心减少,在周边地区增加。对于PM_(2.5),在人口稠密的城市中,不受控制的柴油发电机的社会成本约为2美元/千瓦时,但在PM_(2.5)和NO_x控制下,其社会成本低于10分/千瓦时。以全额成本为基础,发现适当控制的柴油发电机对于满足峰值用电需求具有成本效益。作者推荐使用NO_x和PM_(2.5)控件。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Elisabeth Gilmore, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213;

    rnEngineering and Public Policy and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA;

    rnEngineering and Public Policy and Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号