首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Assessing the Connection between Self-Efficacy for Learning and Justifying Academic Cheating in Higher Education Learning Environments
【24h】

Assessing the Connection between Self-Efficacy for Learning and Justifying Academic Cheating in Higher Education Learning Environments

机译:在高等教育学习环境中评估学习自我效能与证明学术作弊之间的联系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study was aimed at formulating a model to examine the potential value of perceived constructivist pedagogical practices in decreasing tendency to neutralize (justify) academic cheating through a psychological outcome of academic self-efficacy (SE), in three academic learning settings: new learning environments (NLE), traditional face-to-face learning environments (TLE) and distance learning environments (DLE). Data were collected from a sample of 289 undergraduate college students. Path analysis main results showed positive connections between the extent to which constructivist practices are present in the learning settings, as perceived by the participants, and SE, which in turn reduced the tendency toward justifying academic cheating. Analysis of variance results showed that most of the constructivist dimensions were perceived by students enrolled in the NLE as relatively highly present compared with the other groups. Moreover, NLE students held more positive academic SE beliefs and were less inclined toward academic cheating justification than the other groups. Interpretation of these results and implications for future research are discussed.
机译:这项研究旨在建立一个模型,以检验在以下三种学术学习环境中,通过学术自我效能感(SE)的心理结果来中和(合理化)学术作弊的趋势降低的,认知的建构主义教学实践的潜在价值。 (NLE),传统的面对面学习环境(TLE)和远程学习环境(DLE)。数据是从289名本科生的样本中收集的。路径分析的主要结果表明,在参与者所感知的学习环境中,建构主义实践的程度与SE之间存在正相关关系,这反过来减少了证明学术作弊的趋势。方差分析的结果表明,与其他群体相比,非英语学习的学生大多数都认为建构主义维度相对较高。此外,非语言学院的学生持有更积极的学术SE信念,比其他群体更不倾向于学术作弊辩护。讨论了这些结果的解释及其对未来研究的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号