首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Academic Ethics >Education Journal Editors' Perspectives on Self-Plagiarism
【24h】

Education Journal Editors' Perspectives on Self-Plagiarism

机译:教育期刊编辑对自我P窃的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The perspectives of academic journal editors regarding self-plagiarism were examined by means of an online survey in which 277 editors of education journals participated. Following the survey, a sub-sample of 14 editors were interviewed. A substantial majority of editors were found to be in accord with the most recent edition of the Publication Manual of the APA in believing that re-use of long, verbatim passages or tables, figures and images from an author's previously published work without appropriate citation is unethical, and most editors viewed less egregious self-borrowing as wrong also. However, numerous editors expressed unease with the general concept of self-plagiarism, and several of them noted contextual factors that can make limited self-plagiarism acceptable. A clear majority indicated support for a common policy regarding self-plagiarism but had doubts about the feasibility of getting agreement on a comprehensive statement.
机译:通过在线调查研究了学术期刊编辑对self窃的看法,其中有277家教育期刊编辑参加了该调查。调查之后,采访了14位编辑者的子样本。人们发现,绝大多数编辑都符合APA最新版本的手册,因为他们认为,在没有适当引用的情况下,重复使用作者先前发表的长篇幅逐字记录或表格,图形和图像是合理的。这是不道德的,而且大多数编辑者也认为,不那么糟糕的自我借贷也是错误的。但是,许多编辑对自self窃的一般概念表示不安,其中一些人指出了可以使有限的自pla窃可接受的背景因素。明显多数表示支持关于regarding窃的共同政策,但对就全面声明达成协议的可行性表示怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号