...
首页> 外文期刊>Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. Part 1, Regular Papers, Brief Communications & Review Papers >Theoretical Analysis of Apparent Barrier Height on an Al Surface: Difference by Measurement Methods
【24h】

Theoretical Analysis of Apparent Barrier Height on an Al Surface: Difference by Measurement Methods

机译:铝表面视障壁高度的理论分析:测量方法的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have analyzed the difference in apparent barrier height (ABH) by the approach and modulation methods, using the boundary-matching scatteringTstate density functional method, in which electric states under an applied bias voltage are self-consistently calculated. We found that the approach and modulation methods provide nearly the same calculated ABH values for a wide range of tunneling conductances from 10~(-11) to 10~(-5) Ω~(-1). The change in ABH in the tunneling conductance range from 10~(-11) to 10~(-1) Ω~(-1) is smaller than that in the tunneling conductance range from 10~(-7) to 10~(-5) Ω~(-1) suggesting that some of the observed discrepancies between the two methods may be due to the difference in tip-sample distance. Furthermore, we also found that the change in modulation amplitude, which is caused by the force acting on the tip atom due to the applied bias voltage, can account for the observation that the modulation method provides a smaller ABH value than the approach method.
机译:我们使用边界匹配散射Tstate密度泛函方法通过方法和调制方法分析了表观势垒高度(ABH)的差异,该方法可自洽计算施加的偏置电压下的电态。我们发现,对于从10〜(-11)到10〜(-5)Ω〜(-1)的大范围隧穿电导,该方法和调制方法提供的计算ABH值几乎相同。从10〜(-11)到10〜(-1)Ω〜(-1)的隧穿电导率的ABH变化小于从10〜(-7)到10〜(- 5)Ω〜(-1)表明,两种方法之间观察到的某些差异可能是由于针尖样本距离不同所致。此外,我们还发现,由于施加的偏置电压,由作用在尖端原子上的力引起的调制幅度变化,可以说明以下观点:调制方法提供的ABH值比接近方法小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号