...
首页> 外文期刊>International studies of management & organization >Guest Editor's Introduction: Patterns in the Strategic Evolution of Large, Multi-business Firms
【24h】

Guest Editor's Introduction: Patterns in the Strategic Evolution of Large, Multi-business Firms

机译:客座编辑介绍:大型,多业务公司的战略演进模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The vast majority of strategy and organization research still largely centers on the analysis of an individual strategic decision or action by a single firm taken at one specific point in time. Thereby, such research fails to consider the history, sequences, and patterns of a firm's action repertoire and those of other market constituents (i.e., competitors). This negligence is particularly troublesome as recent contributions in competitive strategy and corporate strategy research have increasingly shown that a firm's competitive behavior, and the value creation impact of major strategic decisions, cannot be adequately explained and understood without considering the emerging or manifested patterns in both firm and industry activity. Research in corporate strategy may take different directions: (1) the conceptualization of so-called serial acquirers (e.g., Brauer and Schimmer 2010; Chatterjee 2009; Laamanen and Keil 2008); (2) the analysis of sequences and spillover effects across portfolio restructuring decisions (e.g., Barkema and Schijven 2008; Kim et al. 2011; Zollo and Reuer 2010); and (3) the study of the influence of patterns (i.e., waves) in industry acquisition and divestiture activity on the timing and outcomes of a firm's actions (McNamara et al. 2008; Brauer and Wiersema 2012). These directions of research widely underscore the necessity to move away from an analysis of a single firm event and its outcome to a more comprehensive analysis of streams of firm actions that emerge from the particular trajectories of firms, which are embedded in broader streams of industry activity.
机译:绝大多数策略和组织研究仍主要集中在单个公司在某个特定时间点对单个战略决策或行动的分析。因此,这样的研究没有考虑到企业的行为准则以及其他市场成分(即竞争者)的历史,序列和模式。这种疏忽尤其麻烦,因为最近在竞争战略和公司战略研究中的贡献越来越表明,如果不考虑两家公司的新兴或明显模式,就不能充分地解释和理解一家公司的竞争行为以及主要战略决策的价值创造影响。和行业活动。公司战略研究可能会朝着不同的方向发展:(1)所谓的连续收购者的概念化(例如Brauer和Schimmer 2010; Chatterjee 2009; Laamanen和Keil 2008); (2)分析投资组合重组决策中的顺序和溢出效应(例如Barkema和Schijven 2008; Kim等人2011; Zollo和Reuer 2010); (3)研究行业收购和剥离活动中的模式(即波动)对公司行动的时间和结果的影响(McNamara等人,2008年; Brauer和Wiersema,2012年)。这些研究方向广泛强调了必须从对单个公司事件及其结果的分析转向对从特定公司轨迹产生的公司行为流进行更全面分析的必要性,这些特定行为嵌入在更广泛的行业活动流中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号