首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy >Dialectics in socio-scientific inquiry: Islam contra Occident
【24h】

Dialectics in socio-scientific inquiry: Islam contra Occident

机译:社会科学探究中的辩证法:伊斯兰教反对西方

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study dialectical methodology as a scientific reasoning process in Islam comparatively with mainstream philosophy of science. Design/methodology/approach – Comparative discursive method of inquiry using the language of philosophy of science and abstract mathematization (limited use). Findings – This is a theoretical paper of an intellectual category, which presents the arguments within the framework of the principle of universal and pervasive complementarities as the evidential sign of the epistemology of unity of knowledge studied through functional ontological logical formalism. Research limitations/implications – The theoretical nature of an argumentative paper is at best a foundation one rather than an empirical one. Practical implications – An example of the Islamic dialectical methodology of unity of knowledge is applied to socioeconomic development in Islamic perspective. Originality/value – There is believed to be no other paper on Islam and its dialectical methodology in scientific reasoning compared to the theory of dialectics in mainstream philosophy of science in the contemporary literature.
机译:目的–本文的目的是相对于主流科学哲学研究辩证方法作为伊斯兰的科学推理过程。设计/方法/方法–使用科学哲学和抽象数学化(有限使用)语言的比较性话语探究方法。调查结果–这是一篇有关知识分子的理论论文,提出了在普遍性和普遍性互补原则框架内的论点,这些论点是通过功能本体论逻辑形式主义研究的知识统一性认识论的证据。研究的局限性/含义-辩论论文的理论性质充其量只是基础论文,而不是经验论文。实际意义-从伊斯兰角度将知识统一的伊斯兰辩证方法论的一个例子应用于社会经济发展。原创性/价值–与当代文学主流科学哲学中的辩证法理论相比,在科学推理中没有关于伊斯兰及其辩证方法的其他论文。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号