...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of remote sensing >Comparison Of Local Transfer Function Classifier And Radial Basis Function Neural Network With And Without An Exhaustively Defined Set Of Classes
【24h】

Comparison Of Local Transfer Function Classifier And Radial Basis Function Neural Network With And Without An Exhaustively Defined Set Of Classes

机译:有和没有详尽定义的类集的局部传递函数分类器和径向基函数神经网络的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The local transfer function classifier (LTF-C) is a new radial basis function (RBF)-like neural network, but it uses an entirely different learning algorithm, so as to achieve the novel ability of locally partitioning the feature space. This paper investigates LTF-C and the RBF neural network with reference to land cover classification with and without an exhaustively defined set of classes using Landsat-5 TM data. Results indicate that LTF-C achieves higher accuracy, usually with fewer hidden units, than the RBF neural network with an exhaustively defined set of classes. LTF-C is more stable than the RBF neural network during classifications of the testing set, including the untrained class. Through the setting of post-classification thresholds on the network's outputs, a well-trained RBF neural network sometimes gives abnormally high output value for an input pattern which represents the untrained class. Meanwhile, a well-trained LTF-C outputs extremely low values all the time under the same circumstances. Therefore, LTF-C may outperform the RBF neural network in detecting or removing the atypical classes that are excluded from the training set, which maybe useful in situations where only interesting types of land cover are selected in the training set, due to high labour costs or difficulties in defining all classes represented in a study area.
机译:局部传递函数分类器(LTF-C)是一种类似于径向基函数(RBF)的神经网络,但是它使用了完全不同的学习算法,从而实现了对特征空间进行局部划分的新颖能力。本文使用Landsat-5 TM数据,根据土地覆盖分类(有和没有详尽定义的类别集),研究了LTF-C和RBF神经网络。结果表明,与具有详尽定义的类集的RBF神经网络相比,LTF-C具有更高的准确性(通常具有更少的隐藏单元)。在测试集分类(包括未经训练的分类)期间,LTF-C比RBF神经网络更稳定。通过在网络的输出上设置分类后阈值,训练有素的RBF神经网络有时会为代表未训练类别的输入模式提供异常高的输出值。同时,训练有素的LTF-C在相同情况下始终输出极低的值。因此,LTF-C在检测或除去训练集中排除的非典型类别方面可能胜过RBF神经网络,这可能在劳动力成本高的情况下仅在训练集中选择有趣类型的土地覆盖的情况下有用或难以定义研究区域中代表的所有班级。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International journal of remote sensing》 |2009年第2期|p.85-96|共12页
  • 作者

    L. LI; J. MA; Q. WEN;

  • 作者单位

    State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Jointly Sponsored by the Institute of Remote Sensing Applications, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Beijing Normal University, PO Box 9718, Beijing, 100101, PR China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 遥感技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号