...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of qualitative studies in education >The science of context: modes of response for qualitative researchers in education
【24h】

The science of context: modes of response for qualitative researchers in education

机译:情境科学:教育中定性研究人员的应对方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

How might qualitative researchers meaningfully operate in a contemporary research climate that holds to such limited conceptions of what constitutes ‘scientific’ research in education? This article discusses implications of scientifically based research (SBR) and identifies several pathways along which researchers may productively work in such a context. These include: (1) Conducting critical inquiry into the socio-intellectual frameworks and institutional networks driving such policy development; (2) Educating peers and policy-makers about key precepts of cultural practice and qualitative research; (3) Achieving greater transparency in research designs, inference and theory development, and quality criteria; (4) Adopting mixed-methods research designs; and (5) Undertaking public access or public-interest education research. The central aim is to orient qualitative researchers to those modes of scholarship that can most powerfully impact the projects to which they are committed, and thereby extend the notion and application of SBR.
机译:定性研究人员如何在当代教育环境中有意义地开展工作,而这种现代教育环境却对教育的“科学”研究构成了如此有限的观念?本文讨论了基于科学的研究(SBR)的含义,并确定了研究人员可以在这种情况下有效开展工作的几种途径。其中包括:(1)对推动这种政策发展的社会知识框架和体制网络进行严格的调查; (2)向同行和决策者介绍文化实践和质性研究的重要戒律; (3)在研究设计,推理和理论发展以及质量标准方面实现更大的透明度; (4)采用混合方法研究设计; (五)进行公共获取或公益教育研究。中心目标是使定性研究人员适应那些能够最有效地影响他们所从事的项目的奖学金模式,从而扩展SBR的概念和应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号