首页> 外文期刊>International journal of modeling, simulation and scientific computing >Vibration characteristics simulation and comparison of traditional cab system model and seat-cab coupled model for trucks
【24h】

Vibration characteristics simulation and comparison of traditional cab system model and seat-cab coupled model for trucks

机译:传统驾驶室系统模型和座椅驾驶室耦合模型的振动特性模拟与卡车

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To define the application fields of the traditional cab system model and the seat-cab coupled model, this paper mainly aims to investigate the differences of the vibration characteristics of the two models. First, the two models and their motion equations were introduced. Then, based on the mechanical parameters of the seat and cab system for a truck, the transmissibility characteristics of the two models were analyzed. The results show that the traditional model can relatively accurately predict the pitch and roll vibration characteristics of the real seat-cab system. However, it overvalues the vertical vibration transmitted from the front suspensions of the cab. Third, the typical excitation conditions and the measuring points were selected. Finally, under the typical excitation conditions, the dynamic responses of the measuring points were calculated. The results show that under the vertical excitation condition, the dynamic responses of the two models have obvious differences. Under the roll excitation condition and the pitch excitation condition, the roll responses and the pitch responses of the cab between the two models show almost no obvious difference. Under the random excitation condition, the vertical acceleration responses have relatively larger deviations between the two models, however, the angular acceleration responses are almost the same. For the preliminary design of the cab system, the traditional cab system model can be used. However, for the accurate design and the optimization of the seat-cab system, the seat-cab coupled model is recommended.
机译:为了定义传统驾驶室系统型号和座椅驾驶室耦合模型的应用领域,本文主要旨在研究两种型号的振动特性的差异。首先,介绍了两种模型及其运动方程。然后,基于用于卡车的座椅和驾驶室系统的机械参数,分析了两种模型的传动特性。结果表明,传统模型可以相对准确地预测真实座椅驾驶室系统的俯仰和卷振动特性。然而,它过度高估从驾驶室的前悬架传播的垂直振动。第三,选择典型的激发条件和测量点。最后,在典型的激励条件下,计算测量点的动态响应。结果表明,在垂直励磁条件下,两种模型的动态响应具有明显的差异。在辊励动条件和俯仰激发条件下,两种模型之间的驾驶室的辊响应和桨距显示几乎没有明显的差异。在随机激励条件下,垂直加速度响应在两种模型之间具有相对较大的偏差,然而,角度加速度响应几乎相同。对于驾驶室系统的初步设计,可以使用传统的驾驶室系统模型。然而,对于精确的设计和座椅驾驶室系统的优化,建议使用座椅驾驶室耦合模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号