...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of mobile and blended learning >Blended Learning as a Good Practice in ESL Courses Compared to F2F Learning and Online Learning
【24h】

Blended Learning as a Good Practice in ESL Courses Compared to F2F Learning and Online Learning

机译:与F2F学习和在线学习相比,混合学习是ESL课程中的一种良好实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Blended learning has been studied for many years. However, it is necessary to assess whether blended learning is a good practice as opposed to face-to-face and online learning. Based on the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education, a questionnaire was designed to compare blended learning in seven dimensions to traditional and online learning. A total of 653 students participated in the research. Independent T-test, paired T-test and ANCOVA were conducted using SPSS. The results showed that blended learning was reported to have a higher effectiveness than traditional learning for all seven principles and a higher effectiveness than online learning for most of the principles. Learning modes had a significant effect on student perceptions on most of the principles. Gender had significant effect on student perception of all seven principles, while year of study and knowledge domain did not show significant effects on most of the principles. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed.
机译:混合学习已经研究了很多年。但是,有必要评估混合学习相对于面对面和在线学习是否是一种好的做法。根据《大学教育良好实践七项原则》,设计了一个调查表,将七个维度的混合学习与传统和在线学习进行比较。共有653名学生参加了这项研究。使用SPSS进行独立的T检验,配对T检验和ANCOVA。结果表明,据报道,对于所有七个原则,混合学习的效果均高于传统学习,而对于大多数原则,混合学习的效果均高于在线学习。学习模式对大多数原则上的学生认知有重大影响。性别对学生对所有七个原理的认知都有显着影响,而学习年限和知识领域对大多数原理没有显着影响。讨论了这些发现的可能原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号