...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of law and information technology >The Unimportance of being 'electronic' or - popular misconceptions about 'Internet contracting'
【24h】

The Unimportance of being 'electronic' or - popular misconceptions about 'Internet contracting'

机译:“电子化”的不重要或对“互联网承包”的普遍误解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Existing e-commerce literature abounds with misconceptions regarding both technology and contract law. Long-standing legal concepts are adorned with "e-" or "cyber-" to appear more exciting. The traditional contractual regime is supplanted with new principles instead of being supplemented with technological considerations. It is one thing, to include technology in legal analyses, it is another to create separate, technology-specific categories. Separate categories justify the departure from traditional principles. Most, if not all, alleged "challenges" created by new communication scenarios fit within the existing legal framework, technological complexity and novelty of the Internet notwithstanding. Most "challenges" are also unrelated to the fact that transactions are concluded on the Internet or with electronic means. The new transacting environment frequently exacerbates pre-existing difficulties, but does not necessarily create them. It is probably too late to abandon popular terminology. It is not too late, however, to recognize its limited implications.
机译:现有的电子商务文献中充斥着对技术和合同法的误解。长期使用“ e-”或“ cyber-”装饰的法律概念显得更加令人兴奋。传统的合同制以新的原则代替,而不是以技术上的考虑作为补充。将技术包括在法律分析中是一回事,而创建单独的,特定于技术的类别则是另一回事。分开的类别证明了偏离传统原则的合理性。尽管不是全部,但由新的通信情景造成的大多数所谓的“挑战”都符合现有的法律框架,技术的复杂性和互联网的新颖性。大多数“挑战”也与通过互联网或电子方式完成交易这一事实无关。新的交易环境经常加剧先前存在的困难,但不一定会造成困难。放弃流行术语可能为时已晚。然而,认识到其有限的含义还为时不晚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号