首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of engineering education >Reflective Inquiry in Design Reviews: The Role of Question- Asking During Exchanges of Peer Feedback
【24h】

Reflective Inquiry in Design Reviews: The Role of Question- Asking During Exchanges of Peer Feedback

机译:设计评论中的反思探究:问题在对等反馈交换期间提出的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Design reviews are common educational practice in domains engaged in project-based learning approaches. This is the 'learning space' where students meet with instructors, their peers and other stakeholders to discuss the progress of their work. Anumber of research studies have looked into various phenomena taking place during design reviews. In this study, we adopt an inquiry-driven framework to investigatehowquestion-asking influences the quality of the feedback exchanged between peers working in different teams during design review meetings. Building on previous work, specifically in design research, we extend previous contributions not only on the role of questions as influencing the design thinking process, but also on their perceived value (by the respondents) and thus their general benefit for constructing valuable feedback in design reviews. We find that high performing student teams provide more and better feedback during peer-to-peer design reviews. Further, deep reasoning and generative design questions are perceived as more valuable than low-level questions.
机译:设计评价是从事基于项目的学习方法的域中的常见教育实践。这是学生与教师,同行和其他利益相关者会面的“学习空间”,以讨论他们的工作进度。在设计评审期间,研究的数量研究研究了各种现象。在这项研究中,我们采用了一个探索驱动的框架来调查,以便在设计审查会议期间,影响在不同团队工作的同行之间交换的反馈质量。在以前的工作中,特别是在设计研究中,我们不仅在对影响设计思维过程中的问题的作用而扩大了以前的贡献,也扩展了他们的意识(受访者),因此他们在设计中构建有价值的反馈的一般好处评论。我们发现高性能的学生团队在点对点设计评论中提供更多更好的反馈。此外,深入推理和生成设计问题被认为比低级问题更有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号