首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of engineering education >Design Ethics: The Social Ethics Paradigm
【24h】

Design Ethics: The Social Ethics Paradigm

机译:设计伦理学:社会伦理学范式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Technology is human behavior that transforms society and transforms the environment. Design is the cornerstone of technology. It is how we solve our problems, fulfill our needs, shape our world, change the future, and create new problems. From extraction to disposal in the life-cycle of a product, the design process is where we make the most important decisions; the decisions that determine most of the final product cost, and the decisions that determine most of the ethical costs and benefits. It is quintessentially an ethical process. Ethics is not an appendage to design but an integral part of it, and we advocate using the moral imagination to draw out the ethical implications of a design. We will stress and develop the social ethics paradigm, because design is an iterative social process for making technical and social decisions that may itself be designed at each stage with different people at the table, different information flows, different normative relationships, different authority structures, and different social and environmental considerations in mind. Despite the considerable recent growth in the literature and teaching of engineering ethics, it is constrained unnecessarily by focusing primarily on individual ethics using virtue, deontological, and consequentialist ethical theories. In contrast, the social ethics method requires an examination of the social arrangements for making decisions that is particularly relevant to the iterative, decision-making, design process. Different social arrangements may be made for making any decision, each of which arrangement embodies different ethical considerations and implications. Dewey argued in much the same way for a scientific and experimental approach to ethics in general: 'What is needed is intelligent examination of the consequences that are actually effected by inherited institutions and customs, in order that there may be intelligent consideration of the ways in which they are to be intentionally modified in behalf of generation of different consequences.'. The social ethics paradigm that we will unfold owes much to the pragmatist thought of John Dewey.
机译:技术是改变社会,改变环境的人类行为。设计是技术的基石。这就是我们解决问题,满足我们的需求,塑造我们的世界,改变未来,创造新问题的方式。从产品的生命周期中的提取到废弃,设计过程是我们做出最重要决定的地方。确定大多数最终产品成本的决策以及确定大多数道德成本和收益的决策。这是典型的道德过程。道德不是设计的附属物,而是设计的组成部分,我们提倡使用道德想象力来勾勒出设计的伦理含义。我们将强调和发展社会道德范式,因为设计是一个迭代的社会过程,用于制定技术和社会决策,而决策本身可能在每个阶段都由不同的人在桌子上,不同的信息流,不同的规范关系,不同的权限结构,以及不同的社会和环境考虑因素。尽管最近在文学和工程伦理学方面有了长足的发展,但它却受到不必要的限制,主要是利用美德,道义论和结果主义伦理学理论将重点放在个人伦理上。相反,社会伦理学方法要求检查与决策,决策,设计过程特别相关的社会安排以做出决策。可以做出不同的社会安排来做出任何决定,每种安排都体现了不同的道德考量和含义。杜威对科学的科学方法和实验方法的论点大致相同,他认为:“需要的是对继承的制度和习俗实际上造成的后果进行明智的审查,以便可以明智地考虑到道德规范的方式。为了产生不同的结果而有意对其进行修改。”。我们将要展现的社会道德范式很大程度上要归功于实用主义的约翰·杜威思想。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号