首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Educational Management >Overcoming irrationality: the Popperian approach
【24h】

Overcoming irrationality: the Popperian approach

机译:克服非理性:波普尔的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how associationism mistakenly assumes that direct experience is possible; that is, there is expectation-free observation and association without prior expectation. Thus, associationism assumes that learning involves the absorption of information from the environment itself. However, contrary arguments take the position that, for an individual to make a connection between his/her behaviour and its consequence(s), he/she must first have an expectation in order for a connection to be made. Design/methodology/approach - This paper uses a personal experience to illustrate how implicit assumptions and unstated expectations can be found in the corporate world. It offers to answer questions that will lead to an examination of overcoming irrationality through utilization of the Popperian philosophy of associationism. Findings - When evaluating a practice, it is easier to find evidence of some sort to support the practice, especially if we are either disposed to do so or if our colleagues and organizations have recommended that we adopt these practices. However, if we are committed to genuinely improving our practice, Swann (2009) suggests that we become critical and ask, "What are the unintended and undesirable consequences of doing things this way?" (p. 8). Research limitations/implications - Popper's approach needs to be developed or learned through stages and with time. We need to be aware that it takes time to master the use of this approach. Merely introducing or having organizations learn the different methods or short cuts have only a limited effect in improving their ability to deal with issues in different contexts. Practical implications - The examples used throughout this paper illustrate that the adoption of Popper's approach does not necessarily require large-scale experiments. In fact, a well-conducted case study can be effective in casting doubt on existing assumptions. Regardless of the nature of the research strategy and the scale of the experiment devised to test a hypothesis, the task of testing can and will be problematic. Social implications - Expectations can make us look foolish from time to time, but they can also be very powerful or useful because they are more than mere anticipation. If we are unable to strip away our preconceptions or prior knowledge, we can at least acknowledge our biases and, in doing so, we may not continue to be trapped within our own perspectives, which can blind us to the truth. Originality/value - The examples used in this paper illustrate that Popper's approach is robust and applicable in a variety of contexts and is not limited to educational organizations. Furthermore, it showcases our irrationality, and helps us understand when and where we may make erroneous decisions.
机译:目的-本文的目的是说明联想如何错误地假设直接经验是可能的;就是说,有没有期望的观察和联想而没有事先的期望。因此,协会主义假设学习涉及从环境本身吸收信息。但是,相反的论点则认为,对于一个人来说,要在他的行为与其后果之间建立联系,他/她必须首先抱有期望,以便建立联系。设计/方法/方法-本文使用个人经验来说明如何在企业界中找到隐含的假设和未陈述的期望。它提供了回答一些问题的答案,这些问题将导致通过运用波普尔的社团主义哲学来克服非理性。调查结果-在评估一种做法时,更容易找到某种证据来支持该做法,特别是如果我们要么愿意这样做,或者如果我们的同事和组织建议我们采用这些做法,则尤其如此。但是,如果我们致力于真正改善我们的做法,Swann(2009)建议我们变得批判性的并问:“用这种方式做事会带来哪些意料之外的不良后果?” (第8页)。研究的局限性/含义-Popper的方法需要分阶段并随时间发展或学习。我们需要意识到,掌握这种方法需要花费时间。仅仅介绍或让组织学习不同的方法或捷径对提高其在不同情况下处理问题的能力的作用有限。实际意义-本文中使用的示例说明,采用Popper方法不一定需要进行大规模实验。实际上,进行良好的案例研究可以有效地质疑现有的假设。无论研究策略的性质和为检验假设而设计的实验规模如何,检验的任务都可能会出现问题。社会影响-期望有时会使我们看起来很愚蠢,但期望也可能非常强大或有用,因为它们不仅仅是预期。如果我们无法摆脱先入为主的观念或先验知识,那么我们至少可以承认自己的偏见,并且在这样做时,我们可能不会继续陷于自己的视野之内,而这可能使我们对事实视而不见。原创性/价值-本文中使用的示例说明了Popper的方法是可靠且适用于各种情况的,并且不仅限于教育组织。此外,它展示了我们的非理性,并帮助我们了解了何时何地可能做出错误的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号