首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Disability, Development and Education >Inclusion in Physical Education: A review of literature
【24h】

Inclusion in Physical Education: A review of literature

机译:融入体育:文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this review was to analyse empirical studies on inclusion in physical education (PE) over the past 20 years and then propose recommendations for future research. A systematic process was used to search the literature for this review. First, a total of 75 research-based articles from computerised education databases were included in this review. Second, the publication descriptor data were summarised and analysed according to the geographic distribution, study period, research theme, and research method. Results showed that the number of studies on inclusive PE increased in the past 20 years, and most of these studies were contributed by authors in developed countries. Quantitative methods were the major research method employed in the reviewed studies. Third, we performed a content analysis on the descriptive data and identified three recurring themes from the empirical research. These included: stakeholder (e.g., teachers and parents) perspectives of inclusive PE, effective inclusive practices, and the impacts of inclusion on students with and without disabilities. Of the 75 studies reviewed, 49 (65%) focused on stakeholder perspectives on inclusive PE. The data indicated that stakeholders philosophically support inclusive PE, but numerous concerns and different opinions exist. Only 12 (16%) studies examined the effects of different inclusive strategies. The studies suggested that strategies such as peer tutoring and cooperative learning can provide useful support within inclusive PE. A total of 14 (19%) studies focused on the effect of inclusion on students with and without disabilities. The data indicated that inclusion in PE does not affect the learning outcome of students without disabilities when given support (e.g., using paraprofessionals and adapted PE specialists) or when a solid curriculum is used. However, students with disabilities experienced less motor engagement than their peers without disabilities. The findings of these studies also indicated that although students with disabilities can gain benefits from social interactions in inclusive PE, social isolation of students with disabilities also exists. In conclusion, this review has enhanced our knowledge of the type of studies undertaken in the field of inclusive PE for students with disabilities and some of the outcomes for these students.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdisabilities, inclusion, inclusive education, inclusive physical education, integrated education, mainstreaming, physical education, systematic reviewRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2012.697737
机译:这篇综述的目的是分析过去20年中关于纳入体育教育的实证研究,然后为今后的研究提出建议。使用系统的过程来搜索文献以进行本次综述。首先,本评价共纳入了来自计算机教育数据库的75篇基于研究的文章。其次,根据地域分布,研究时间,研究主题和研究方法,对出版物描述符数据进行汇总和分析。结果表明,在过去的20年中,关于包容性PE的研究数量有所增加,并且其中大多数研究是由发达国家的作者提供的。定量方法是本综述研究中采用的主要研究方法。第三,我们对描述性数据进行了内容分析,并从实证研究中确定了三个重复出现的主题。其中包括:利益相关者(例如,老师和父母)对全纳体育的观点,有效的全纳实践以及全纳对有残疾和无残疾学生的影响。在审查的75项研究中,有49项(65%)侧重于利益相关者对包容性私募股权的观点。数据表明,利益相关者在哲学上支持包容性体育,但存在许多关注和不同意见。只有12(16%)个研究检查了不同包容性策略的效果。研究表明,同伴辅导和合作学习等策略可以在包容性体育教育中提供有用的支持。共有14项研究(19%)着重研究了包容性对有或没有残疾学生的影响。数据表明,在有支持的情况下(例如,使用超专业人士和经过调适的体育专家)或使用扎实的课程表,将体育课程包括进来不会影响没有残疾的学生的学习成果。但是,与没有残疾的同龄人相比,残疾的学生较少从事运动。这些研究的结果还表明,尽管残疾学生可以从全纳体育中的社交互动中受益,但也存在残疾学生的社会隔离。总而言之,这项审查增进了我们对残疾学生全纳体育领域研究类型以及这些学生的一些成果的了解。查看全文下载全文关键词残疾,包容,全纳教育,全纳体育,综合教育,主流化,体育教育,系统评价相关的变量add add_id “ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2012.697737

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号