首页> 外文期刊>The international information & library review >To talk or not to talk? From Telkom to Hellkom: A critical reflection on the current telecommunication policy in South Africa from a social justice perspective
【24h】

To talk or not to talk? From Telkom to Hellkom: A critical reflection on the current telecommunication policy in South Africa from a social justice perspective

机译:说话还是不说话?从Telkom到Hellkom:从社会正义的角度对南非当前电信政策的批判性思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With the development of new information and communication technologies, the right to communicate assumes new dimensions, since it is almost impossible to fully participate in the globalized world without access to modern information and communication technologies. South Africa held its first democratic elections in 1994 and has subsequently returned to the international arena. Its citizens should rightly expect to be able to participate in all that this return offers, not only politically, but also economically and socially. Telecommunications are vital to making such participation possible. In recognition of this fact, the newly elected government developed policies and enacted legislation to ensure that the telecommunications sector, and specifically the sole fixed line service provider Telkom, provides South African citizens affordable access to the telecommunications infrastructure whilst providing acceptable levels of service. However, rather than meeting its obligation to the government and the people of South Africa, Telkom has misused its monopoly. The social injustice that this situation creates is critically examined against the background of the right to communicate based on Rawls' principles of social justice and Sen's capability approach.
机译:随着新的信息和通信技术的发展,通信权呈现出新的维度,因为如果不使用现代信息和通信技术,几乎不可能完全参与全球化的世界。南非于1994年举行了第一次民主选举,随后又重返国际舞台。它的公民应该正确地期望能够在政治上,经济上和社会上参与这种回报所提供的一切。电信对于使这种参与成为可能至关重要。认识到这一事实,新当选的政府制定了政策并颁布了立法,以确保电信部门,尤其是唯一的固网服务提供商Telkom,能够为南非公民提供负担得起的电信基础设施访问权限,同时提供可接受的服务水平。但是,Telkom没有履行对南非政府和人民的义务,而是滥用了其垄断地位。根据罗尔斯的社会正义原则和森的能力方法,在交流权的背景下严格审查了这种情况造成的社会不公。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号