首页> 外文期刊>Interacting with Computers >How People Judge the Usability of a Desktop Graphic User Interface at Different Time Points: Is there Evidence for Memory Decay, Recall Bias or Temporal Bias?
【24h】

How People Judge the Usability of a Desktop Graphic User Interface at Different Time Points: Is there Evidence for Memory Decay, Recall Bias or Temporal Bias?

机译:人们如何在不同时间点判断桌面图形用户界面的可用性:是否有证据表明存在内存衰减,召回偏差或时间偏差?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The System Usability Scale (SuS) survey is a widely respected tool for measuring usability. Generally, a SuS score is administered directly after a usability test to assess the usability and user experience of digital products. However, some researchers have used SuS as a survey as part of longitudinal 'in the wild' trials where SuS is often completed some period after the trial. The aim of this research was to determine if a participant's memory of a product's usability would change if a SuS survey was administered at different times after a test. Hence, we sought to understand if recalling the usability of a digital technology was affected by temporal bias or memory decay. This paper includes results and findings from two studies, study 1 involved evaluating a web application and study 2 involved evaluating a virtual learning environment. Collectively the two studies had 212 participants (n = 212). The findings conclude that there is no significant change of the user's recollection of the usability of digital product as evidenced by an analysis of users who completed multiple SuS surveys over a short term period of 3 weeks or over an extended period of time of 6 months.RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTSThe system usability scale is used to test for memory decay and temporal bias in judging the user experience of technologies at different time points.212 participants took part in two studies ranging from 3 weeks to 6 months.There is no evidence that there is a temporal bias or memory decay when users complete a SuS survey at the two different time points of 3 weeks and 6 months.
机译:系统可用性量表(SuS)调查是一种广泛使用的衡量可用性的工具。通常,在可用性测试之后直接管理SuS分数,以评估数字产品的可用性和用户体验。但是,一些研究人员将SuS用作调查的一部分,作为纵向“野外”试验的一部分,因为SuS通常在试验后的某个时期完成。这项研究的目的是确定如果在测试后的不同时间进行SuS调查,参与者对产品可用性的记忆是否会改变。因此,我们试图了解召回数字技术的可用性是否受到时间偏差或内存衰减的影响。本文包括两项研究的结果和发现,研究1涉及评估Web应用程序,研究2涉及评估虚拟学习环境。两项研究总共有212名参与者(n = 212)。调查结果得出结论,对在短短3周或6个月的时间内完成多次SuS调查的用户的分析表明,用户对数字产品可用性的回忆没有明显变化。研究重点系统可用性量表用于测试内存衰减和时间偏差,以判断不同时间点的技术用户体验.212名参与者参加了为期3周至6个月的两项研究,没有证据表明存在当用户在3周和6个月的两个不同时间点完成SuS调查时,时间偏差或记忆衰退。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号