首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science >Fragmentation or Differentiation: Questioning the Crisis in Psychology
【24h】

Fragmentation or Differentiation: Questioning the Crisis in Psychology

机译:分裂或分化:质疑心理学的危机

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is a recurrent discourse about the fragmentation of psychology and its crises as a science, which often leads to a disenchanted view about its future. To this discourse we oppose a developmental one, in which crises can be occasions for development, and in which development might imply differentiation. We first review why psychology can be said to be in crisis. We then situate the crisis in the pragmatics of doing psychology. Crises occur when psychologists have problems either working with other psychologists or with communities. We argue that collaborative research is a way to overcome these crises. Specifically we suggest three specific scientific activities that can lead to the development of psychology: collaborative research methods, the identification of nodal concepts that enable the bringing together of different approaches and disciplines, and the creation and maintenance of institutional spaces that enable creative, collaborative work.
机译:关于心理学的碎片化及其作为一门科学的危机,有一种反复出现的论述,这常常导致人们对心理学的未来产生迷惑的看法。对于这种话语,我们反对一种发展性话语,在这种话语中危机可能是发展的时机,而发展可能暗示着分化。我们首先回顾一下为什么可以说心理学处于危机之中。然后,我们将危机置于做心理学的语用学中。当心理学家在与其他心理学家或社区合作时遇到问题时,就会发生危机。我们认为合作研究是克服这些危机的一种方法。具体而言,我们建议了三种可能导致心理学发展的特定科学活动:协作研究方法,确定使不同方法和学科融合在一起的节点概念,以及创建和维护能够进行创造性的协作工作的机构空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号