首页> 外文期刊>Inquiry >Heidegger's Last God;
【24h】

Heidegger's Last God;

机译:海德格尔的最后一位神;

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we discuss Martin Heidegger's position on the so-called god-lessness of our current age. Rather than holding that we must either await the advent of god or enthusiastically embrace our godlessness, Heidegger holds that a third option is available to us: we could fundamentally change the way we experience the world by leaving behind all remnants of metaphysical thinking. In Section II, we show that, despite the absence of god, our current historical moment shares a metaphysical structure with the god-oriented epochs that preceded it. A metaphysical epoch involves a single, all-encompassing understanding of the entities in the world and how they ought to be arranged, usually established by a God who serves as a paradigm for those entities. In Section HI, we discuss how the metaphysical age arose in the first place; the polytheistic world of the ancient Greeks was tumultuous and unpredictable, such that its inhabitants began to desire a stable, planned-out world that could be established by a single God. In the final section, we examine Heidegger's obscure discussion of the last god, who is to lead us out of metaphysics by a fundamental shift of the sort that led us into metaphysics. We discuss the basic features that will define a post-metaphysical age, and the last god's role in bringing this age about. We argue that this age resembles the pre-metaphysical age of the ancient Greeks, but rather than being polytheistic, it will be "polydivinistic".
机译:在本文中,我们讨论了马丁·海德格尔(Martin Heidegger)对当今时代所谓的“无神”的立场。海德格尔并没有坚持认为我们要么等待上帝的来临,要么热情地拥护我们的无神论,而是认为我们有第三种选择:我们可以通过抛弃所有形而上学思维的残余,从根本上改变我们体验世界的方式。在第二节中,我们表明,尽管没有上帝,但我们当前的历史时刻与之前的以上帝为导向的时代有着形而上学的结构。形而上学的时代涉及对世界上各个实体以及如何安排它们的单一,全面的理解,通常是由作为这些实体范例的上帝所建立的。在HI部分,我们首先讨论形而上学的年龄是如何产生的。古希腊人的多神论世界是动荡的和不可预测的,因此它的居民开始渴望一个可以由一个上帝建立的稳定的,计划外的世界。在最后一节中,我们研究了海德格尔对最后一个神的晦涩讨论,后者是通过导致我们进入形而上学的根本转变将我们带出形而上学的。我们讨论了定义后形而上学时代的基本特征,以及最后一位神在这个时代的到来。我们认为,这个年龄类似于古希腊人的形而上学时代,但不是多神论的,而是“多神论的”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Inquiry》 |2011年第2期|p.160-182|共23页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy,HMNSS Building Rrn. 1604, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92521, USA;

    Department of Philosophy,HMNSS Building Rrn. 1604, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92521, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号