首页> 外文期刊>Infinite energy >Critique of Nature Perspective Article on Google-Sponsored Pd-D and Ni-H Experiments
【24h】

Critique of Nature Perspective Article on Google-Sponsored Pd-D and Ni-H Experiments

机译:基于谷歌赞助的PD-D和NI-H实验的自然透视文章批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

God bless Google! I am certain that I have never said this before and am unlikely to again, but in the context of my title I am delighted with the effort and the results of their four-year activity. This is vaguely self-praise and therefore slightly biased commentary since I was directly involved with Google and the team at the start of this activity in 2014 and 2015. But I have had no direct involvement since. Is the Nature Perspective article perfect? No, nothing is. But my grumbles are few and I will dispose of them before enumerating what I feel are four startling positives. The team wanted to maintain separation from the CMNS (Condensed Matter Nuclear Science) community-a clean-sheet approach-so their vision and conclusions would be seen to be impartial and their sponsor's involvement concealed. Because of this disconnect the authors' perspectives did not fully reflect current thinking in the CMNS community.
机译:上帝保佑谷歌!我确信我以前从未说过这一点,不太可能再次,但在我的标题的背景下,我很高兴为他们为期四年活动的努力和结果。这是模糊的自我赞美,因此略微偏见的评论,因为我在2014年和2015年在这项活动开始时直接参与了谷歌和团队。但我没有直接参与。自然透视文章是否完美?不,没有什么是。但我的抱怨很少,我会在枚举我的感受之前放弃他们四个惊人的积极态度。该团队希望与CMNS(凝聚态核科学)社区的分离 - 一种清洁纸方法 - 所以他们的愿景和结论将被认为是公正的,其赞助商的参与隐瞒了。由于这种脱离了作者的观点并没有充分反映CMNS社区的目前思考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号