...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial marketing management >Governance mechanisms in domestic and international buyer-supplier relationships: An empirical study
【24h】

Governance mechanisms in domestic and international buyer-supplier relationships: An empirical study

机译:国内外买家-供应商关系中的治理机制:一项实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Governance mechanisms are a key element of business relationships. However, little is known about the possible differences between their uses in domestic versus international business relationships. Drawing on empirical data, we investigate three issues. First, we compare the use of five governance mechanisms (contracts, value-creating norms, value-claiming norms, specific investments, and trust) in purely domestic relationships as opposed to relationships with an international component. We also investigate whether customer satisfaction and commitment differ in these two settings. Second, we extend the model of Palmatier, Dant, and Grewal (2007) by adding two distinct types of governance norms-value-claiming norms and value-creating norms-and analyze the interrelationship between the five governance mechanisms as well as their impacts on business customer satisfaction and commitment. Finally, we analyze the moderating role of internationality on relationships between governance mechanisms and customer commitment. Data from a survey of 296 companies support most of the hypothesized relationships.
机译:治理机制是业务关系的关键要素。但是,人们对其在国内和国际业务关系中使用之间的可能差异知之甚少。利用经验数据,我们研究了三个问题。首先,我们比较了纯粹的国内关系而不是与国际组成部分的关系中五个治理机制(合同,创造价值的规范,价值主张的规范,特定的投资和信任)的使用。我们还将调查这两种设置下的客户满意度和承诺是否有所不同。其次,我们通过添加两种不同类型的治理规范(即价值主张规范和价值创造规范)来扩展Palmatier,Dant和Grewal(2007)的模型,并分析五种治理机制之间的相互关系及其对治理的影响商业客户的满意度和承诺。最后,我们分析了国际性在治理机制和客户承诺之间的关系中的调节作用。来自296家公司的调查数据支持大多数假设的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号